We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Why Germans Love Renting Their Homes
Comments
-
As a general rule of thumb it's 2% of acquisition costs over 50 years. Reducing balance depreciation widely not available since the early 2000s. Tax breaks surely played a big role in those calculations like 15+ years ago, but nowadays people coming to their senses also and realize that positive cash flow is a nice thing to have at times...
still don't understand why anyone becomes a landlord if they make no money : why not just invest in the DAX?0 -
Since 2011 the DAX soared from around 5000 to 9400 points as of today. So where is it going to be in 5-25 years from now and will there still be a Euro at all? Tangible assets are a diversification to one's portfolio, we call it "concrete gold", and it's a version of investment for the risk averse while money's basically burning in the bank at 1% or lower interest rates. Like I said: In the right conditions it's still a viable option.
And of course people intend to make money by becoming a landlord. So do people investing in all kinds of different fields. The reality comes to haunt many as this forum is proof to, I dare say.0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »Really? I've lived in Japan and I did not find that to be true.
That Japan had more floorspace per person?
That would be quite a complex thing to notice.
According to this chart they have 50 dwellings per 100 people compared with about 40 for Western Europe.
http://notbuyinganything.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/average-house-size-by-country.html
shows Japanese house areas bigger but with fewer people per householdThere is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker0 -
Past tax advantages?
I believe it's the case that until recently German tax law meant that you could claim depreciation as a business expense. Something along the lines of - spend €100,000 on a new build property for rent, and you can claim €5,000 a year as depreciation - meaning that the rental income was effectively tax free.
But residential properties do not normally depreciate. Only commercial ones have dilapidation charges.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
