We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Ed Balls pledges to raise taxes if Labour win election

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25894312

Labour would reintroduce the 50p top rate of income tax for those earning over £150,000, if it returns to power, the shadow chancellor has said.

Simon Walker, director general of the Institute of Directors:

"It was, and remains, an envy-driven political gesture designed solely to drive a wedge between voters,"


A point that will probably be illustrated on this thread by sensible posters despising it for the Brown-esque politicking that it is, and class-warrior morons saying how fair it is that anyone with more money than them should be taxed as much as possible.

The top 1% of the country already pay nearly a third of all income tax. Quite amusing that Ed Balls thinks that's unfair on the other 99% of us!
«13456732

Comments

  • mayonnaise
    mayonnaise Posts: 3,690 Forumite
    edited 25 January 2014 at 6:57PM
    Fella wrote: »
    A point that will probably be illustrated on this thread by sensible posters despising it for the Brown-esque politicking that it is....

    A sensible poster (like me :cool:) would say it's irrelevant what Balls says, as he won't be chancellor anytime soon.
    Don't blame me, I voted Remain.
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Who mentioned what Brown says....?
  • Tancred
    Tancred Posts: 1,424 Forumite
    Fella wrote: »
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25894312

    Labour would reintroduce the 50p top rate of income tax for those earning over £150,000, if it returns to power, the shadow chancellor has said.

    Simon Walker, director general of the Institute of Directors:

    "It was, and remains, an envy-driven political gesture designed solely to drive a wedge between voters,"


    A point that will probably be illustrated on this thread by sensible posters despising it for the Brown-esque politicking that it is, and class-warrior morons saying how fair it is that anyone with more money than them should be taxed as much as possible.

    The top 1% of the country already pay nearly a third of all income tax. Quite amusing that Ed Balls thinks that's unfair on the other 99% of us!

    Balls hasn't gone far enough - I would put the 50% rate on all earners who are above £100k a year.

    The top eaners pay more tax for the simple reason that they earn more money!! How can you pay tax if you don't have money in the first place, brains of Britain!
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Don't blame you, confusing Brown with Son Of Brown is easily done!
  • Gangaweed
    Gangaweed Posts: 169 Forumite
    How will they fund that tax rise?
  • Tancred
    Tancred Posts: 1,424 Forumite
    Gangaweed wrote: »
    How will they fund that tax rise?

    Since when do tax rises have to be funded???
  • lostinrates
    lostinrates Posts: 55,283 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    Tancred wrote: »
    Balls hasn't gone far enough - I would put the 50% rate on all earners who are above £100k a year.

    The top eaners pay more tax for the simple reason that they earn more money!! How can you pay tax if you don't have money in the first place, brains of Britain!

    Not necessarily across a household.

    Ad not necessarily without incurring substantially higher costs that, unlike those of politicians, cannot be claimed back as expenses if on PAYE.
  • Fella
    Fella Posts: 7,921 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Lol I knew there'd be an envious little class warrior along to quickly prove my point. It never occurs to these people that maybe those who earn £100k worked hard & deserve it. Or actually it probably does occur to them but they're so jealous they don't care.

    I need to find a way to block seeing the dull outpourings from people I've already got on ignore when someone quotes them though.
  • lostinrates
    lostinrates Posts: 55,283 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    Fella wrote: »
    Lol I knew there'd be an envious little class warrior along to quickly prove my point. It never occurs to these people that maybe those who earn £100k worked hard & deserve it. Or actually it probably does occur to them but they're so jealous they don't care.

    Tbf there are people on excellent salaries who do not work too hard for them, and loads on less great ones who work like stink for very modest return. I don't think that's necessarily the sole issue.

    The fact remains there are some costs it wouldn't be worth incurring for lower salaries or the promise of even greater ones. For example, we pay huge amounts of commuting costs and DH lives away from home mon to fri. This is obviously financial, emotional and sometimes a practical sacrifice. Still, pays back into the economy so long as we aren't hoarding it.
  • vivatifosi
    vivatifosi Posts: 18,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! PPI Party Pooper
    Wasn't there some proof a while back that the 50p tax rate brought in less and therefore it was scrapped based on such evidence? If that's the case, then why reintroduce something that brings in less money?
    Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.