We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
One key, protected from cutting
Comments
-
You have no contract with the person who sent you the bill.
The OP has a contract with the landlord and obligations enshrined in housing law to act in a tenant like manner and pay for expenses relating to the accommodation that result from his behaviour so whether he pays the bill directly or it gets deducted from his deposit, the deduction is legitimate.
For example, a tenant may get their landlord to call out a plumber for a blocked sink but if it is found to be caused by a build up of food debris, then the tenant pays whereas if it was a faulty pipe, the landlord must pick up the tab.
The OP had the right to call out a locksmith off his own bat but perhaps contacted the letting agent because of his mistaken expection that it was their responsibility or a free service or wasn't aware that he could have done so.0 -
-
SerialRenter wrote: »Call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure the bill sender knows where they live.
Indeed - No one directly signs a contract with the HMRC to pay tax, nor signs a document with the local council that obliges them to pay council tax but that doesn't stop them from getting money out of households!0 -
SerialRenter wrote: »Call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure the bill sender knows where they live.
And knows how to get into my house without breaking locks :rotfl:0 -
The OP has a contract with the landlord and obligations enshrined in housing law to act in a tenant like manner and pay for expenses relating to the accommodation that result from his behaviour so whether he pays the bill directly or it gets deducted from his deposit, the deduction is legitimate.
For example, a tenant may get their landlord to call out a plumber for a blocked sink but if it is found to be caused by a build up of food debris, then the tenant pays whereas if it was a faulty pipe, the landlord must pick up the tab.
The OP had the right to call out a locksmith off his own bat but perhaps contacted the letting agent because of his mistaken expection that it was their responsibility or a free service or wasn't aware that he could have done so.
I contacted them because I figured it would be sensible that if they were open, they would have a key (for viewings) and could let me in. Maybe I ask too much of people to be sensible and kind to others though...0 -
The OP has a contract with the landlord and obligations enshrined in housing law to act in a tenant like manner
There is no such thing enshrined in housing law.
I understand there is caselaw though.so whether he pays the bill directly or it gets deducted from his deposit, the deduction is legitimate.
If the money was applied to the tenants deposit, it may be legitimate.
It is not as black and white as you make out.
The fact remains that the OP does not have to pay this carpenter a penny.SerialRenter wrote: »Call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure the bill sender knows where they live.Indeed - No one directly signs a contract with the HMRC to pay tax, nor signs a document with the local council that obliges them to pay council tax but that doesn't stop them from getting money out of households!
Now it is clear you both don't understand the laws of the land. That explains your position more clearly.Well life is harsh, hug me don't reject me.0 -
I would second (or third) getting a new lock. I just bought one for each of my house doors a month ago for £20 each.
A quick 2 minute you-tube video clip and all three changed in about 10 minutes, and I am no way a DIYer.
All locks came with fixing screws, three keys and a security code should i ever need to get new keys cut.
You can use them in this house, and if you ever move into another rented house (or bought house) after this one you can take it with you and change that new lock straight away0 -
There is no such thing enshrined in housing law.
I understand there is caselaw though.
If the money was applied to the tenants deposit, it may be legitimate.
It is not as black and white as you make out.
The fact remains that the OP does not have to pay this carpenter a penny.
Now it is clear you both don't understand the laws of the land. That explains your position more clearly.
So we are agreed then - the OP has an obligation to pay for the call out charge to get him back into the property whereever this legal obligation is found (case law, housing law, whatever).
If he fails to pay the bill directly (his option) then the landlord is perfectly entitled to deduct the charge from his deposit and trying to challenge it in the small claims court or via the deposit scheme dispute service will be a waste of time.
The OP must foot the bill for his own negligence in leaving the key in the property.0 -
Paully232000 wrote: »I would second (or third) getting a new lock. I just bought one for each of my house doors a month ago for £20 each.
A quick 2 minute you-tube video clip and all three changed in about 10 minutes, and I am no way a DIYer.
All locks came with fixing screws, three keys and a security code should i ever need to get new keys cut.
You can use them in this house, and if you ever move into another rented house (or bought house) after this one you can take it with you and change that new lock straight away
Did it require an electric drill? I don't have any tools aside from a crappy set of screwdrivers and a never ending Mary Poppins drawer of allen keys. (I asked for a drill for Christmas but oddly nobody got me one? Perhaps it's not acceptable to buy a 22 year old girl a drill for Christmas). Just trying to keep the cost down as I obviously have a £100 bill to pay plus I will only be in this property until June now, perhaps earlier.0 -
No any old set of screwdrivers will do. I just used a philips head screwdriver and an allen key. Nothing more than that required.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards