PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! However well-intentioned, for the safety of other users we ask that you refrain from seeking or offering medical advice. This includes recommendations for medicines, procedures or over-the-counter remedies. Posts or threads found to be in breach of this rule will be removed.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Dry vs tinned pulses - which is cheaper?

Options
2»

Comments

  • maman
    maman Posts: 29,696 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    =
    I'm also not convinced about SCs because they use far more energy(electric) over long periods of time than cooking with gas. They are one of those things that people jump on the bandwagon without really looking into it with any detail.

    .

    I could be wrong but I always thought SCs used similar amount of electric to a light bulb.

    The only pulses I cook from scratch are butter beans as I find most of the others I use can be bought cheaply enough in cans. Although you do need to check as recently I got canned butter beans in an Asian shop cheaper than dry ones.

    I cook a large batch of butter beans in the slow cooker and then freeze in portions rather than cook a few each time I need them.
  • The ones that I have looked at had an energy rating of around 250watts. Maybe it's not quite that high once it's heated but it was the power rating of a number that i looked at.

    This site suggest they are not that energy efficient and cost just as much as a more conventional electric cooker. However I did not say electric! I said compared with gas which I believe is a far more efficient and cheaper method of cooking.
  • terra_ferma
    terra_ferma Posts: 5,484 Forumite
    Elliesmum wrote: »
    I think it is cheaper to use dried. I did a comparison and the dried equivalent of a 400g non-drained tin of chickpeas is 22p.

    This does not factor in the cooking time/cost, I have a pressure cooker which takes 30 minutes to cook soaked peas.

    This is a max saving of 11p a tin in theory and of course if you batch cook and then freeze pulses, your energy costs are even cheaper and you have that almost instant tin convenience as you can defrost from the freezer in the microwave.

    HTHs

    EM x

    That's interesting, considering that most of the pulses I have in my cupboard right now were 4 for £1 (although no longer that cheap now, 3 x £1 at my local store), they would probably work out cheaper, or the same price, once you take into account other costs.
  • valk_scot
    valk_scot Posts: 5,290 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    How about cooking the dried ones in larger batches and freezing them in suitable quantities for later use? Would cut the cooking cost overall.
    Val.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.