We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
What is "Sale by tender"?
Comments
-
Then "offers above" a low starting point might be the way to go.
Sounds to me more like the agent has an interest in encouraging this particular mode of selling, than in getting the best price for you.Been away for a while.0 -
Are you near a stamp duty threshold?
We're selling at £250k. One of the agents who came round to value said that one of the ways they get more money for people selling at £250k (where buyers won't go higher because of the SD threshold) is that they accept an offer of £250k but have the buyer pay the EA selling fee instead of the seller. In our case, that would have meant the buyer paid the £3k bill instead of us so would have been like getting £253k.
I was slightly dubious as to what HMRC would think of this so didn't pursue it...0 -
We have been searching for a property to buy in our area and I've seen one agent on the are starting doing this in a few properties. We were interested on a 2 bed house, but this method required the buyer to pay 2% as an introduction fee (essentially state agents fee) as well as introducing conditions like: If your bid gets accepted you can't backtrack without penalties, and you must commit to a 12 month period in which if you want to sell the house you must be using this state agents.
All of this, combined with in my opinion an overvaluation, put me off and we never bid. Checking RightMove this week I've seen the property now being advertised by this agent and two others for £10K less and no mention of tender. So I can only assume that this didn't work despite it being a very interesting property on a nice area in SW London with significant demand.0 -
I've seen a couple of house in my area (outer London borough) being sold this way and failing. I can't understand why they weren't sold the normal way as they weren't particularly unique or highly desirable in any way. However if yours is unique and highly desirable then take a look further at what buyers would have to do to bid and see what other properties they've successfully sold this way.Don't listen to me, I'm no expert!0
-
... there are 70+ buyers looking right now for this type of property here (so I'm told).
Not the same thing at all.0 -
IMO trying the get the buyer to pay the agents' fee is a terrible idea. As you point out in the OP, they'll reduce their offer to compensate, so you'll be no better off, but it's actually worse than that. Since they need cash to pay the fee, it needs to come out of their deposit, possibly decreasing the amount they can borrow and so reducing their offer even further.
Or they just won't bother as it's all so much more hassle than buying any other house on the market.0 -
About the 70+ buyers.
If they had that many wanting to compete for your property they would just make a few phone calls and get their commission without having to do any real marketing.
When we were selling we had endless leaflets from rival agents claiming to have buyers lined up; presumably buyers who cannot use Rightmove and only want to buy through one agent!
Are they lying? Are their lips moving?Been away for a while.0 -
Running_Horse wrote: »About the 70+ buyers.
If they had that many wanting to compete for your property they would just make a few phone calls and get their commission without having to do any real marketing.
When we were selling we had endless leaflets from rival agents claiming to have buyers lined up; presumably buyers who cannot use Rightmove and only want to buy through one agent!
Are they lying? Are their lips moving?
Reminds me when we were selling our house with one agent (Agent A), and one of the bigger EAs phoned me and said something along the lines of we have a couple of people who are looking for a house just like yours, in your street.
Conversation soon ended when I said, oh good tell them to phone Agent A and they can come and view.Never did get any viewings from them I don't think!
0 -
Ivana_Tinkle wrote: »IMO trying the get the buyer to pay the agents' fee is a terrible idea. As you point out in the OP, they'll reduce their offer to compensate, so you'll be no better off, but it's actually worse than that. Since they need cash to pay the fee, it needs to come out of their deposit, possibly decreasing the amount they can borrow and so reducing their offer even further.
Or they just won't bother as it's all so much more hassle than buying any other house on the market.
This.
There is an EA in London using this method and its a real put off. Seems a bizarre way of doing business compared to the normal method. I'm pretty sure if Ebay started charging the buyer introduction fees then they would quickly go out of business. The problem is that in an area where demand massively outstrips supply as in London, then why wouldn't sellers take advantage? Frustrating though. As a FTB its challenging enough already to raise a deposit as well as all the normal fees and then fork out EA fees on top.
I am going to see 4 properties on Saturday, all have open house days and 2 of them are Sale By Tender. If I like them then my bids will certainly be the 2% below what I would normally offer to compensate, which probably means I won't get them but so be it.0 -
OK so its time for an update.
Recap: the agent said S.B.T. was the best thing since sliced bread and will get people bidding above ask, there is massive demand and desirability in my area, my flat is in great condition, buyers are only saying positive things, it is valued/priced correctly, etc etc.
Yet, after 2 open days and many viewings in between, I have only received one bid, today, and that was for £23k below the asking price!!! Something just does not add up here? I'm beginning to agree with those of you above who say that S.B.T. is a massive put-off. Not that I was ever really "pro" S.B.T. to begin with.
I'm going to have a little chat with the EA tomorrow....I hear the cry of the silence around me.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards