📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can a store be sued for selling dangerous shoes

Options
1246789

Comments

  • wealdroam
    wealdroam Posts: 19,180 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Mrs_Wilson wrote: »
    IMO the price has little relevance in this situation...

    Unfortunately, the Sale of Goods Act says otherwise.

    Section 14 of SoGA says (amongst other things):
    (2) Where the seller sells goods in the course of a business, there is an implied term that the goods supplied under the contract are of satisfactory quality.
    (2A) For the purposes of this Act, goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory, taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances.
    Note that price should be taken into account when determining whether the quality is satisfactory.
  • So in the 6 months you've roughly owned the shoes, did you not become aware that something with a plastic bottom is likely to be slippy when used on a wet surface?
  • mo786uk
    mo786uk Posts: 1,379 Forumite
    The fact that soemthing is cheap does not make a huge difference to expectation on safety and enforcement of the law - much resources is put into cheap tat imported from abroad (by regulators) because it presents a risk - the fact that it is cheap is not relevant - its more about the volume and potential harm.

    Some of you are missing the point - the waa gives the consumer a right to sue for an unsafe product that causes injury - that right has existed since 1932 since Donaghue v Stevennson under negligence and is enshrined in statute

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/43/section/2

    Its not americanisation if you have a valid reason and from what the OP has said I don't think they have stupidly slipped up.

    maybe csome of the naysayers should consider that if the manufacturer has produced an unsafe product then any losses they suffer might deter them from putting further unsafe products on the market.
  • ouchy2012
    ouchy2012 Posts: 124 Forumite
    Mrs_Wilson wrote: »

    I have just to looked on their website and I am pleased to see that I am not the only one to experience problems with these shoes!
    [/B][/U]

    So you are happy to see other people have ended up in a&e?? :eek:
    Maybe read the reviews before buying in future.

    I bought some Jamie Oliver knifes the other day, I cut my finger on the chopping knife (the one that says chop) ...I wonder can I sue Jamie Oliver? after all the knife sliced my finger when it was meant to be a chopping knife not a slicing knife! :rotfl:
    Wins 2014 - ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVYXYZ

    Jan - :(
    Feb - Baby Shoes
  • harrys_dad
    harrys_dad Posts: 1,997 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    £8 "trainers" with plastic soles??????????????? Why would anyone with a brain buy them for anything except use as carpet slippers. Oh yes, I know, walk through a puddle and sue Asda.
  • ThumbRemote
    ThumbRemote Posts: 4,734 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Faith177 wrote: »
    Have you tried wearing converse in wet weather?

    Which is of no relevance whatsoever as the OP was not wearing Converse, nor was it wet.
  • ThumbRemote
    ThumbRemote Posts: 4,734 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    DaveTheMus wrote: »
    We're you using these training shoes for actual training? If not then you were not using them for the purpose they were actually designed for.

    You seem rather focussed on the concept of misusing a pair of shoes.

    Since 'training' is likely to involve more exertion, so a greater a likelihood of slips, and a greater variety of surfaces than just casual wear, it's hardly misuse to not be training in them.

    Essentially you seem to be arguing that a pair of training shoes would be misued because the wearer stopped running and started walking.
  • ThumbRemote
    ThumbRemote Posts: 4,734 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    harrys_dad wrote: »
    £8 "trainers" with plastic soles??????????????? Why would anyone with a brain buy them for anything except use as carpet slippers. Oh yes, I know, walk through a puddle and sue Asda.

    Because the retailers description specifically states "Get active" and "Good for light exercise and sports".

    So what you seem to be saying is that the retailers description is incorrect, and as such they are liable for negligence?
  • ThumbRemote
    ThumbRemote Posts: 4,734 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Mrs_Wilson wrote: »
    Sorry Jacques, I thought I had already replied to you earlier.

    I have just to looked on their website and I am pleased to see that I am not the only one to experience problems with these shoes!
    IMO the price has little relevance in this situation but I'm sure many of you will say "If you buy something that is so cheap, what do you expect!" What you have to bear in mind is, that I had no desire to run in them, or use them for the gym, I already own trainers several pairs of Nike trainers for jogging etc.

    Surely, I would not be pushing the Asda training shoes to their limits by walking half a mile down the road to buy a newspaper?

    They were advertised as: Sports Trainers

    The shoes description reads:
    "Get active with these great value Sports trainers. Good for light exercise and sports, these shoes have a modern look and are made from strong, durable materials."
    Please read the customer reviews as it appears others are unhappy too.

    Taking into account Asda (via their website and customer comments) knew of the concerns raised in 2013, should they either have withdrawn this product from the market, or made it clear to the consumers that these trainers were substandard and liable to cause injury?
    In light of this ...Has Asda been negligent?

    To answer your main question - in my opinion Asda are negligent in selling these shoes. There are numerous reviews that state the soles are hard plastic, which appears to be unsafe for use in training shoes.

    You therefore have three choices:

    1. Do nothing and bin the shoes.
    2. Pursue a refund of the shoes from Asda, as they are not of satisfactory quality.
    3. Pursue a personal injury claim against Asda. You will need specialist advice for this, so contact a no-win no-fee solicitor for further advice.
  • To answer your main question - in my opinion Asda are negligent in selling these shoes. There are numerous reviews that state the soles are hard plastic, which appears to be unsafe for use in training shoes.

    You therefore have three choices:

    1. Do nothing and bin the shoes.
    2. Pursue a refund of the shoes from Asda, as they are not of satisfactory quality.
    3. Pursue a personal injury claim against Asda. You will need specialist advice for this, so contact a no-win no-fee solicitor for further advice.

    ThumbRemote,


    Thank you so much, a straight answer to straight question...you're a star!:beer:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.