parking charge leeds crown point (excel parking)

4consumerrights

Change this paragraph please and add the bit supplied in red.

It has also been widely reported that some parking companies have provided “witness statements” instead of the relevant contract. There is no proof whatsoever that the alleged signatory on behalf of the landowner has ever seen the relevant contract, or, indeed is even an employee of the landowner. [STRIKE]I require, if such a witness statement is submitted, that it is accompanied by a letter, on landowner’s headed notepaper, and signed by a director or equivalent of the landowner, confirming that the signatory is, indeed, authorised to act on behalf of the landowner, has read and the relevant terms of the contract and is qualified to attest to the full limit of authority of the parking company[/STRIKE]

Use this instead:

]It has also been widely reported that some parking companies have provided “witness statements” instead of the relevant contract. There is no proof whatsoever that the alleged signatory on behalf of the landowner has ever seen the relevant contract, or, indeed is even an employee of the landowner As this has been the case, a signed witness statement is not adequate to prove such authorisation exists and thus is not acceptable in this situation. As stated above only a signed unredacted contract provides the requisite legal standing Excel have in pursuit of parking charges.



You have contradicted the appeal by asking for the contract and then giving Excel the opportunity to provide a witness statement.

Otherwise the appeal is good to go.

turbonutter

i will do hoohoo thanks mate

turbonutter

Thanks for all your help guys i am going to send it to popla and see what the outcome is at the end will keep you all informed wish me luck :-)

turbonutter

Appeal sent :-)

turbonutter

Well guys i cannot thank any of you enough my appeal with popla was successful on the grounds of the charge was not a genuine pre-estimate of loss :-)

Redx

turbonutter wrote: »

Well guys i cannot thank any of you enough my appeal with popla was successful on the grounds of the charge was not a genuine pre-estimate of loss :-)

in that case, please add your success to the successful POPLA APPEALS thread by aardvark in the crabman sticky thread

and well done

thanks

Coupon-mad

turbonutter wrote: »

Well guys i cannot thank any of you enough my appeal with popla was successful on the grounds of the charge was not a genuine pre-estimate of loss :-)

Well done, just as we knew it would pan out.