We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
State pensions should be slashed

nashly
Posts: 384 Forumite
down to unemployment benefit rates as state pensions are the biggest drain on this country by far, as the government states that a single or couple can live on unemployment benefit then why can't pensioners who don't have to spend money looking for work and probably eat less than younger people live on the same rates ?
It would save the UK from a catastrophe that the pension bill will cause.
It would save the UK from a catastrophe that the pension bill will cause.
0
Comments
-
difference is pensioners have worked for there money
dossers can get of !!!!!! to earn more than pension would ever be0 -
The difference is that pensioners have PAID for their money. I actually sent money to fund my NI contributions from overseas for 15 years. So now that I'm back in my home Country I can get part of the State Pension.
It's not comparable with having lost a job and become unemployed for a short period of time.
And pensioners have plenty of expenses: heating their house for longer than working people have to, and often needing warmth as they are older; maintaining their homes, or paying rent; they still need food and clothes (although I get most of mine from charity shops), and so on.
PS - agree with newbie1980's assessment!0 -
Just to play devil's advocate here but what about pensioners that never worked? receiving the state pension doesn't guarantee that they did actually pay anything towards it...Thinking critically since 1996....0
-
Also to be devils advocate maybe it should be means tested.0
-
somethingcorporate wrote: »Just to play devil's advocate here but what about pensioners that never worked? receiving the state pension doesn't guarantee that they did actually pay anything towards it...
In general, it's felt that letting people starve, is somehow wrong.0 -
Also to be devils advocate maybe it should be means tested.
It's a qualifying benefit: so are you expecting that someone who has paid in quite a lot of money over their working lives, should not receive the same amount who ends up with less money at retirement?
We do have pension credit to build up State Pension for those who are poorer.0 -
somethingcorporate wrote: »Just to play devil's advocate here but what about pensioners that never worked? receiving the state pension doesn't guarantee that they did actually pay anything towards it...
This was fairly unheard of till recent times. Its only now we will have a number of pensioners who have spent their lives being career benefits claimants.0 -
Also to be devils advocate maybe it should be means tested.
Doubt it very much. Any attempt to do so would condemn the incumbent Government a very very long period of political exile or even extinction.
However, offering an optional 'opt out' of The state pension to those with a guarantee of other alternate pension income (above a certain level - £20k) in exchange for tax concessions or relief - that could be an idea.0 -
Oh my, and here's me thinking it's the government and the bankers that are screwing this country over and leading us up the creek paddleless when it's the o.a.p's all along!
benefits and pensions are the biggest drain?
that's comical :T0 -
peterg1965 wrote: »Doubt it very much. Any attempt to do so would condemn the incumbent Government a very very long period of political exile or even extinction.
However, offering an optional 'opt out' of The state pension to those with a guarantee of other alternate pension income (above a certain level - £20k) in exchange for tax concessions or relief - that could be an idea.
how would that work?
if the tax benefits of opting out were better than the pension then the taxpayer would lose
if the opposite, why would the person be stupid enough to make the opt out.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards