NOW OPEN: the MSE Forum 'Ask An Expert' event. This time we'd like your questions on TRAVEL & HOLIDAY DEALS. Post by Wed and deals expert MSE Oli will answer as many as he can.

MSE News: Stop using costly 0845 numbers, Government departments told

in Phones & TV
11 replies 1.6K views
"Government departments have been told to stop using premium-rate phone lines for core public services...."
Read the full story:

Stop using costly 0845 numbers, Government departments told

OfficialStamp.gif


Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
«1

Replies

  • OblivionOblivion Forumite
    20.2K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic
    And about time too, although I agree it's a huge shame that no deadline has been set.


    Some are ahead on this one. I was pleased to note that the DWP had an 0800 number (free to landlines) when I phoned to claim my state pension last week. I hope other governMINT departments make the switch as soon as possible.
    ... Dave
    Happily retired and enjoying my 14th year of leisure
    I am cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    Bring me sunshine in your smile
  • FarwayFarway Forumite
    12.1K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    Oh, just "guidance" then not a directive

    Any bets on what will happen?
  • This will save money for people calling from mobiles.

    Unfortunately, it will result in phone calls from people on standard BT tariffs, calling during the day, paying 8p/min for 01/02/03 numbers instead of 2p/min for 0845 numbers.

    When organisations make changes that could result in a 4 times increase in cost, more of a fuss is normally made. I think MSE could have written a more balanced article, rather than giving 0845 numbers a blanklet label of 'costly' and referring to them as 'premium rate'.

    They are only costly for some people in some circumstances. For a great many people they are actually considerably cheaper.

    The best option would be to ensure both 0845 or 0800 numbers and 01/02/03 numbers are offered.
  • 10059221005922 Forumite
    174 Posts
    Seventh Anniversary 100 Posts
    Forumite
    Farway wrote: »
    Oh, just "guidance" then not a directive

    Any bets on what will happen?

    DWP are moving over to them, more info coming in the New Year as to which Jobcentre lines will get a new number
  • YpaymoreYpaymore Forumite
    2.8K Posts
    labman wrote: »
    This will save money for people calling from mobiles.

    Unfortunately, it will result in phone calls from people on standard BT tariffs, calling during the day, paying 8p/min for 01/02/03 numbers instead of 2p/min for 0845 numbers.

    When organisations make changes that could result in a 4 times increase in cost, more of a fuss is normally made. I think MSE could have written a more balanced article, rather than giving 0845 numbers a blanklet label of 'costly' and referring to them as 'premium rate'.

    They are only costly for some people in some circumstances. For a great many people they are actually considerably cheaper.

    The best option would be to ensure both 0845 or 0800 numbers and 01/02/03 numbers are offered.

    The 0845 numbers will be retained for a while as a secondary number.

    See: http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.php?t=4853816
  • Oblivion wrote: »
    And about time too, although I agree it's a huge shame that no deadline has been set.

    "We expect all national and local government departments to announce their plans for moving to compliance early in the New Year. [FONT=Calibri,Calibri][FONT=Calibri,Calibri]DWP [/FONT][/FONT]will be at the front of this, along with other notable services such as the [FONT=Calibri,Calibri][FONT=Calibri,Calibri]Environment Agency Floodline[/FONT][/FONT]. The guidance also covers services delivered by contractors, such as the [FONT=Calibri,Calibri][FONT=Calibri,Calibri]Citizens Advice Consumer Helpline and [/FONT][/FONT]the [FONT=Calibri,Calibri][FONT=Calibri,Calibri]Student Loans Company."[/FONT][/FONT]


    http://www.fairtelecoms.org.uk/uploads/1/1/4/5/11456053/caguidance.pdf
  • edited 28 December 2013 at 10:47AM
    Steve059Steve059 Forumite
    2.7K Posts
    edited 28 December 2013 at 10:47AM
    Firstly, calls to 01/02/03 numbers are only inclusive up to 1 hour. This still won't guarantee getting through a person, being transferred to the correct person and getting the problem sorted with the DVLA and HMRC.

    Secondly, how are the government departments going to manage without their "cut" of the call revenue? And 01/02/03 numbers will cost them money.

    DC: "All government departments should stop using premium rate telephone numbers".
    DC's Personal Private Secretary: "Yes, Prime Minister". :)
    If you fold it in half, will an Audi A4 fit in a Citroen C5? :)
  • PincherPincher
    6.6K Posts
    Forumite
    What about going IP, so I can call them on SkyPE for FREE.

    Not that it matters, I probably call the council or the government departments about once a year. Changed the car this year, but didn't need to call the DVLA even once.
  • YpaymoreYpaymore Forumite
    2.8K Posts
    Steve059 wrote: »
    Firstly, calls to 01/02/03 numbers are only inclusive up to 1 hour. This still won't guarantee getting through a person, being transferred to the correct person and getting the problem sorted with the DVLA and HMRC.



    www.weq4u.co.uk will come in handy then.
  • BobQBobQ Forumite
    11.2K Posts
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    You would think that considering how many calls the Government departments make themselves they would consider banning firms using them all together.

    Each 0870/0845 number is mapped to a standard number already. So why should anyone have to pay extra for a superfluous service.

    The original idea of these numbers was to save the public money by enabling anyone to make a local rate call (eg in Cornwall) but give the receiver of the call the option to locate the service in a call centre (eg in Birmingham). The reasoning was that it was unfair that you paid extra just because you lived far from the call centre. Now its just a rip off wherever you live.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Energy Price Cap change

Martin Lewis on what it means for you

MSE News

Best £1 you've ever spent?

Share your most impressive bargains

MSE Forum