We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Should Black Or Dark-Coloured Cars 'Wear' Hi-Viz?
Options

armyknife
Posts: 596 Forumite

What's with the fashion for buying black cars nowadays ?
It seems to have replace the trend for silver and before that red cars.
In daylight these cars aren't conspicuous and in low light or at night, despited their lights, it's sometimes hard to judge their width/dimensions, especially if they're coming close to oneself on a bike.
So my question is, should they be made to 'wear' some high-visibility markings/'clothing' ?
Posting the thread here, as it's relevant to non-vehicular road users and if I posted in the motoring section it would probably be regarded as a troll.
It seems to have replace the trend for silver and before that red cars.
In daylight these cars aren't conspicuous and in low light or at night, despited their lights, it's sometimes hard to judge their width/dimensions, especially if they're coming close to oneself on a bike.
So my question is, should they be made to 'wear' some high-visibility markings/'clothing' ?
Posting the thread here, as it's relevant to non-vehicular road users and if I posted in the motoring section it would probably be regarded as a troll.
0
Comments
-
Strange, I thought the in colour for cars is white now? Anyways, balck cars have been around just a little less time than cyclists, it's up to all road users to ensure their safety and the safety of others, I'm a cyclist myself, but a lady on a push bike the other morning nealry missed xmas through her lack of low visibilty clothing on a winter morning around a busy roundabout, where there have been fatalities in the past.0
-
What's with the fashion for buying black cars nowadays ?
It seems to have replace the trend for silver and before that red cars.
In daylight these cars aren't conspicuous and in low light or at night, despited their lights, it's sometimes hard to judge their width/dimensions, especially if they're coming close to oneself on a bike.
So my question is, should they be made to 'wear' some high-visibility markings/'clothing' ?
Posting the thread here, as it's relevant to non-vehicular road users and if I posted in the motoring section it would probably be regarded as a troll.
And you would be absolutely right! :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
Merry Christmas :xmastree:PLEASE NOTEMy advice should be used as guidance only. You should always obtain face to face professional advice before taking any action.0 -
As a former driver of ten years and an occasional cyclist... I can't say I've had any problems in general with the visibility of black cars except in low light levels... when the car should have it's lights on (and thus be visible) anyway.
What drives me crazy is how car drivers rattle along the road at 20mph or more! Expecting pedestrians to get out of their way! They don't even wear helmets some of them! (*hic* Just testing Father Christmas' sherry!)0 -
It's never a problem I've encountered or even considered with dark coloured cars, with mandatory DRL's these days their visibility has improved for newer cars anyway.
John0 -
It didn't bother Henry Ford.0
-
Perhaps your eye test is overdue OP?Accept your past without regret, handle your present with confidence and face your future without fear0
-
I've got a grey car, and I'm used to mostly having red ones. I drive round with my lights on most of the time anyway as I have too many people not seeing me! No need for high vis jackets, turn your lights on!0
-
I don't have an issue with black cars, I have an issue with drivers who don't use their ****ing headlights, as if parking lights are of any use to anyone.
At night, when you need to focus ahead MUCH more, when a car is looming up behind you, at least you know it's there by the light on the road. But if some plank (usually in a Nissan) is driving about with no lights or just parking lights, then they're on top of you before you even know it.
Oh and "hi-viz" on cars? I'm sick of it as it is, with cars driving about looking like Police panda cars, I loose count how many near accidents i've seen when a speeding drivers see's one, slams on the anchors and nearly wipes out anyone within a 10metre radius.
Daytime running lights (DRLs) are now a legal requirement on all new cars
I suspect it was an easy way to solve the problem of drivers not using their lights. Seeing as how the authorities have invested so much money in telling us that speed and/or alcohol are THE ONLY things that cause accidents, the last thing they want to do is confuse that message with "actually being a complete and utter moron is dangerous too".“I may not agree with you, but I will defend to the death your right to make an a** of yourself.”
<><><><><><><><><<><><><><><><><><><><><><> Don't forget to like and subscribe \/ \/ \/0 -
No
The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters.0 -
Even if a car has hi-vis cyclists who are not looking will still ride into them.:rotfl:
Regarding "parking" lights, it's perfectly legal and sensible to use these alone if there is street lighting in a <30mph zone.
Regarding Daytime running lights, they're stupid. Everybody used to be visible during the day until half the cars had lights and half didn't.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards