We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Nursery Overcharging
Comments
-
You have definitely been overcharged but the maths is a little confusing.
I worked it out but my working out was too untidy to post.
It is quite possible that the nursery don't really understand that they have over charged you.
You have to remember that once the structure changes next year if you are still around for Xmas, it will benefit you. Think of the whole year rather than the 3 months.
So you haven't really lost out unless you leave soon as over the whole year you will still pay the same as everyone else, just in different payments.0 -
Kayalana99 they evenly distribute payment over a year so even though a session costs £41.90 and my child has attended 49 days (over the last three months). I have paid £2136.90 rather than £2053.10.0
-
claire.louise2 wrote: »Kayalana99 they evenly distribute payment over a year so even though a session costs £41.90 and my child has attended 49 days (over the last three months). I have paid £2136.90 rather than £2053.10.
Really, they should have pro-rata'd over the three months rather than twelve.
Will they not put your overpayment as money paid forward until next year?
You need to ask them for a complete breakdown of what they think you've paid for and then get them to justify the overpayment."One day I realised that when you are lying in your grave, it's no good saying, "I was too shy, too frightened."
Because by then you've blown your chances. That's it."0 -
claire.louise2 wrote: »Kayalana99 they evenly distribute payment over a year so even though a session costs £41.90 and my child has attended 49 days (over the last three months). I have paid £2136.90 rather than £2053.10.
It really depends on the terms of contract you signed with the Nursery in September as to whether you are entitled to a refund. The terms of the new contract do not come into force until January 2014 so the orginal agreed contract is binding until then.0 -
you are no better or worse off now for 2013 if they did or did not make the change. 2014 is a whole new year and charge.
And even this year, you only pay 1/4 towards the xmas week that no one uses, as only paid 1/4 of the year. If you have paid all of 2013, you would have paid for 1 whole extra week. So you are up on the deal!0 -
hhmm - so you lucked out at the timing of the pricing change. But £125 extra for a nursery to do a great job in looking after your little one - is it really that big a deal?Snootchie Bootchies!0
-
hhmm - so you lucked out at the timing of the pricing change. But £125 extra for a nursery to do a great job in looking after your little one - is it really that big a deal?
£125 would be a big deal to me! And I would imagine most nurseries would be quick to pursue £125 if it was owed to them!
I wouldn't be inclined to write it off either OP.
I think it would depend on what is actually stated in the contract? Does it say cost per session multiplied by the number of sessions? Or just an annual sum split into 12 months? I would think the wording is crucial to whether you can pursue it?
As an aside though....by your workings out they have only overcharged by £83.80 and not £125.
I'd still want my £83.80 back though!0 -
Surely if you have paid the same as the others for 3 months .... and they have paid for 12 months ... and you have got a "free week", you're ahead!0
-
claire.louise2 wrote: »Kayalana99 they evenly distribute payment over a year so even though a session costs £41.90 and my child has attended 49 days (over the last three months). I have paid £2136.90 rather than £2053.10.
Ok, so the difference in what you think you should have paid is £83.80, not £125.00.
£83.80 is the exact cost of 2 sessions. September to December is roughly 1/3 of the year so it looks like they did prorata.
A third of 5 days is 1.66 days due. Perhaps they rounded up, perhaps the actual dates were more accurate than my approximate 1/3 of a year.
Even so, if you have overpaid by 0.34 days, then you would be owed only £14.25 by my reckoning.
Christmas tip!"On behalf of teachers, I'd like to dedicate this award to Michael Gove and I mean dedicate in the Anglo Saxon sense which means insert roughly into the anus of." My hero, Mr Steer.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards