We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
New to investing- interpreting data
Comments
-
Apologies yes I just looked at 3 years. I strongly suspect that the article writers did the same...! A bit worrying...
If you look at the current 5 year return on the HL site for that fund it's running at 103.4% with 27.59% in the last three years. That is much closer to the figures you're looking at.
5 years to May 2013 would have been much lower than 5 years to Nov 2013 so I suspect the article is correct.
EDIT - just checked the figures to May 2013 (% change to May 2009,2010,2011,2012,2013)
-28.9
47.8
12.8
-2.3
18
To Nov 2013:
29.2
16.2
-0.2
6.6
27.2
So on the basis of these the article is correct at 5 years and shows how important it can be to understand the data and how it is calculated.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards