We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Prudential Flexible Investment Plan (Bond)

Options
Hello All,
I have the above type of investment together with several OEIC's.
Could somebody advise whether there is a difference in the way these two different types of investments are taxed.
Many thanks

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,680 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Investment bonds are taxed different to OEICs. No CGT as corporation tax is paid on growth within the fund. Although losses can lead to the funds being prepared for tax being "refunded" within the fund. Insurance companies still get tapering relief. Income on investments internally within life funds is handled much the same way as OEICs.

    Personal taxation is different. Higher rate taxpayers can avoid higher rate tax through use of an investment bond by being able to defer the gains until they are basic rate taxpayers. There is a relief called top slicing relief that can aid in this. There is no CGT payable on investment bonds.

    There is more but they are probably the key things.

    Pecking order wise, ISA remains in front of investment bond but OEIC and investment bond are largely cost neutral for basic rate taxpayers. Historically, costs could be more beneficial on larger amounts in an investment bond but nowadays the costs are fairly neutral between them. In most cases, you would find OEIC marginally beating Bond in the pecking order unless you hit the niche areas where bond is better.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • dunstonh wrote: »
    Investment bonds are taxed different to OEICs. No CGT as corporation tax is paid on growth within the fund. Although losses can lead to the funds being prepared for tax being "refunded" within the fund. Insurance companies still get tapering relief. Income on investments internally within life funds is handled much the same way as OEICs.

    Personal taxation is different. Higher rate taxpayers can avoid higher rate tax through use of an investment bond by being able to defer the gains until they are basic rate taxpayers. There is a relief called top slicing relief that can aid in this. There is no CGT payable on investment bonds.

    There is more but they are probably the key things.

    Pecking order wise, ISA remains in front of investment bond but OEIC and investment bond are largely cost neutral for basic rate taxpayers. Historically, costs could be more beneficial on larger amounts in an investment bond but nowadays the costs are fairly neutral between them. In most cases, you would find OEIC marginally beating Bond in the pecking order unless you hit the niche areas where bond is better.

    dunstonh Thanks so much for your fulsome reply,I'm very grateful to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.