Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Prudential Flexible Investment Plan (Bond)
atlanticspan
Posts: 28 Forumite
Hello All,
I have the above type of investment together with several OEIC's.
Could somebody advise whether there is a difference in the way these two different types of investments are taxed.
Many thanks
I have the above type of investment together with several OEIC's.
Could somebody advise whether there is a difference in the way these two different types of investments are taxed.
Many thanks
0
Comments
-
Investment bonds are taxed different to OEICs. No CGT as corporation tax is paid on growth within the fund. Although losses can lead to the funds being prepared for tax being "refunded" within the fund. Insurance companies still get tapering relief. Income on investments internally within life funds is handled much the same way as OEICs.
Personal taxation is different. Higher rate taxpayers can avoid higher rate tax through use of an investment bond by being able to defer the gains until they are basic rate taxpayers. There is a relief called top slicing relief that can aid in this. There is no CGT payable on investment bonds.
There is more but they are probably the key things.
Pecking order wise, ISA remains in front of investment bond but OEIC and investment bond are largely cost neutral for basic rate taxpayers. Historically, costs could be more beneficial on larger amounts in an investment bond but nowadays the costs are fairly neutral between them. In most cases, you would find OEIC marginally beating Bond in the pecking order unless you hit the niche areas where bond is better.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Investment bonds are taxed different to OEICs. No CGT as corporation tax is paid on growth within the fund. Although losses can lead to the funds being prepared for tax being "refunded" within the fund. Insurance companies still get tapering relief. Income on investments internally within life funds is handled much the same way as OEICs.
Personal taxation is different. Higher rate taxpayers can avoid higher rate tax through use of an investment bond by being able to defer the gains until they are basic rate taxpayers. There is a relief called top slicing relief that can aid in this. There is no CGT payable on investment bonds.
There is more but they are probably the key things.
Pecking order wise, ISA remains in front of investment bond but OEIC and investment bond are largely cost neutral for basic rate taxpayers. Historically, costs could be more beneficial on larger amounts in an investment bond but nowadays the costs are fairly neutral between them. In most cases, you would find OEIC marginally beating Bond in the pecking order unless you hit the niche areas where bond is better.
dunstonh Thanks so much for your fulsome reply,I'm very grateful to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179.1K Life & Family
- 263.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards