We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Trevor has gone a step further in the stupidity stakes
Comments
-
Coupon-mad wrote: »Is this the one on pepipoo where bama said he'd show his bits in John Lewis' window if it goes to a hearing?!
No it's off CAG todayProud to be a member of the Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Gang.:D:T0 -
What a winker0
-
What a winker
I'm sure ILW (I Love Winking) will be along here shortly :rotfl:
Anyone seen him lately?
Two for a pair
Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.#Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Getting back to the serious side of things - and I have commented on this before - but who or what the hell is H&S and in what capacity do they purport to act?
H&S Litigation do not employ a solicitor
H&S Litigation are not registered with the Law Society
H&S Litigation are not registered with the Solicitors Regulation Authority as an alternative business structure
H&S Litigation do not have a Consumer Credit Act licence and are not, therefore, registered as a debt collector
So what is it that they do? The implication is that they advise ANPR from a legal point of view but judging by the wording on the so-called claim form I can't imagine anybody with any degree of legal training willingly associating themselves with that.My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0 -
They are in the same vain as court proceedings are they not? Aka ukcpsProud to be a member of the Anti Enforcement Hobbyist Gang.:D:T0
-
It would seem so.kirkbyinfurnesslad wrote: »They are in the same vain as court proceedings are they not? Aka ukcps
Much like EDRS (LDK Group) and there have been others.My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0 -
Except if you look at their website they unlike the others seem to be touting for business, which as we know would be illegal without a licence.0
-
Apart from all the lies (e.g. once court case file, there's no turning back), it's nice to see that they admit that the signage is there to deter parking contrary to the landowners wishes. This clearly makes the parking charge a deterrent rather than a sensible amount, and thus it is unenforceable.0
-
The_Slithy_Tove wrote: »Apart from all the lies (e.g. once court case file, there's no turning back), it's nice to see that they admit that the signage is there to deter parking contrary to the landowners wishes. This clearly makes the parking charge a deterrent rather than a sensible amount, and thus it is unenforceable.
Luckily POPLA agree. However, we have yet to see what IPC decide with their appeals.
Courts are a lottery as we know, so no point is second guessing them.
As long as Joe Public think of these private charges as fines and cough up, the " industry " continues. But the word is spreading - just look at the increase in cases on here - and the number of challenges they will face will increase, as will the pressure on supermarkets and retail parks when genuine customers bite back.0 -
Sadly despite all Trevors dodgy practices there are very few complaints made against him. The DVLA have only received 3 and passed them straight back to the BPA who did nothing.
In fact the BPA said it is ok for Trev to have a 2 stage appeal system despite the code of practice saying a POPLA code should be included in the initial rejection letter. Seems they have a strange definition of "initial" at BPA towers.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards