Sales Of Goods - Clarification Needed On Exchange Rights

MamaMoo_2

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

There is no point in arguing this with you, as you clearly don't have any retail experience.

No, you're right, only spent my entire working life in retail, and also helping out at the family's shop prior to that.
All in all, about 10 years of retail experience, from general dogsbody to store manager.
Also, backing my claims up with the actual legislation, which doesn't require experience of working in retail anyway.

MamaMoo_2

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

Sounds like back tracking to me.

Back tracking on what now? Did I say that it was perfectly reasonable in the OP's case? No. So nothing to back track on. I simply pointed out that a) your claim was bovine excrement and b) a situation where reduction in use under 12 months would be suitable.

societys_child

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

Try reading the post I was replying to.

:huh: I did. I even quoted it for you . . .

Jamie_Carter

MamaMoo wrote: »

No, you're right, only spent my entire working life in retail, and also helping out at the family's shop prior to that.
All in all, about 10 years of retail experience, from general dogsbody to store manager.
Also, backing my claims up with the actual legislation, which doesn't require experience of working in retail anyway.

Well you should know better then

frugal_mike

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

I'm afraid that's not the case for an item that is only 5 months old. The retailer can only choose between a full refund, or replacement.

Which law says this? The Sale of Goods Act doesn't.

Valli

and this was all going so well:rotfl:

MamaMoo_2

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

Well you should know better then

I do. That's why I was able to quote the relevant sections of SOGA.
Will obviously eat my words if you can use SOGA to support your claims.