Is this Section 21 valid?

Foxy-Stoat_3

thesaint wrote: »

Why have you been served a Sec 21?

Is this relevant to the OP's question?

mchale

theartfullodger wrote: »

You have on opportunity to dig your heels in & only leave for loadsamoney.

And then get sued by the LL for all the legal costs & expenses he/she incurred for gaining vacant possession

G_M

BitterAndTwisted wrote: »

Periods are unlikely to run from the 29th of the month to the 30th of the month following as that's month and two days. Much more likely to be from 29th to the 28th.

Still, a Section 21 issued on the 2nd means that the landlord can apply to the court for possession on or after the first of January. Which is what that document implies.

Cheers bitter - minor brainstorm - I've edited my post to correct the dates but itmakesno difference to the invalidity of the S21.

molerat

mchale wrote: »

And then get sued by the LL for all the legal costs & expenses he/she incurred for gaining vacant possession

If the LL was foolish enough to go to court based on an invalid S21they would have to look after their own costs.

ValHaller

ulleswater wrote: »

Thanks for the help.

Last edited by ulleswater; Today at 5:33 PM. Reason: enquiry completed

It is bad form to erase an opening post, especially where the advice has helped resolve the problem - the thread may be useful to someone else. It is only normal to do it if there is an overriding risk of being identified by other parties to the issue. If I recall the thread correctly, all you needed to do was to delete a scan.

ulleswater

ValHaller wrote: »

It is bad form to erase an opening post, especially where the advice has helped resolve the problem - the thread may be useful to someone else. It is only normal to do it if there is an overriding risk of being identified by other parties to the issue. If I recall the thread correctly, all you needed to do was to delete a scan.

Aplogies, was a bit blinkered for leaving to much info on the scan! I'll add some typed info.;)