Vehicle Control Services Ltd

only1eebo

Hi again. Finally received official rejection. Claims of being able to enforce the POFA as they don't have the driver details........but an option to appeal to POPLA.

I have rejigger my earlier post of the appeal making GEOL more obvious and taken the other suggestions on board.

Can I ask if there is any other supporting things I should send? 1photo of their entrance sign is included, where it is claimed it forms the contract, but I probably won't be sending any other pics of signs as they are not the sole appeal point......unless it's suggested they would help?

Any further final advice would be very welcome from anywhere.

Merry Xmas to all who have so far helped

Coupon-mad

Nope don't go mad with attachments, and feel free to use some of the version I linked for you as it's designed exactly for VCS at an Airport. Merry Xmas!

Guys_Dad

They did supply the POPLA code???

only1eebo

PS: POPLA Form give 4 reasons for appeal. Which one is mine, they don't really fit.......I go literally by 'not liable for charge' but the outline reason of stolen vehicle or new ownership via sale doesn't apply.........the other 3 reasons don't seem relevant........

I'd appreciate an opinion

Cheers

Coupon-mad

We know:

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/secret-reasons-you-can-use-in-your.html

As we say every day to all the others who ask the same question, tick 3 out of 4 boxes of course.

Guys_Dad

All except stolen.

only1eebo

Thanks for your help and suggestions. I have now posted my POPLA form and will await the adjudication. I am more than happy to share the result, either way, when I recieve it.............

only1eebo

Got acknowledgement of a hearing date of #th February 2014.

Cheers everyone

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

Good, let us know when ever you get a decision

only1eebo

Evidence pack sent to me by POPLA

Contain 1 video 52 seconds long
Graphics of signs and layout
A contract between PPC and Airport (redacted)
A breakdown of GPEOL including cost to issue PCN, indirect overheads, PCN process, cost associated with appeal....etc
+ a statement of cases supporting the idea that parking charges are not penalties just because it is a breach of contract.........

They have not addressed my request to see CCTV maintenance schedule or evidence of compliance to the Information Act
They have not addressed the rerquest to see evidence that the land is not already covered by 'by-laws' or that the act of stopping in a roadway cannot be called parking.

Guess this is going to be pretty standard stuff.....anything there that I should be worried about ?