We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

possible unfair dismissal - solicitor recommendation

Options
Hi, can anyone recommend a good solicitor if you are facing redundancy which you think is unfair dismissal?

Basically company has taken on staff up to one month ago and now their are redundancies within the department. These newbies aren't in the pool (its the same dept).

Ta
MFW 2013 #146 Target £6000
Sealed pot challenge 6 member #1663 / £167.76
Sealed pot challenge 5 member #1663 / £153.19

Comments

  • marybelle01
    marybelle01 Posts: 2,101 Forumite
    Pools don't have to be based on departments. Have you asked why the pool is as it is?
  • emmita
    emmita Posts: 715 Forumite
    edited 19 November 2013 at 10:34PM
    Pools don't have to be based on departments. Have you asked why the pool is as it is?

    Over staffing in that area. However each person could equally have done one of the other jobs.
    MFW 2013 #146 Target £6000
    Sealed pot challenge 6 member #1663 / £167.76
    Sealed pot challenge 5 member #1663 / £153.19
  • But each person isn't doing that job. They are doing the job they have. And it is the job you have that is at risk, not one that you could have "equally done". Sorry, but I am not seeing your argument holding any water,
  • emmita
    emmita Posts: 715 Forumite
    If a company knows about redundancies as I understand it they should first try to find suitable employment rather than redundancies. Should the job not have first have been offered to one of these in the pool as they are qualified to do the job or is it OK to employ a temp worker by making them permanent? This really is why I would like to discuss with a good solicitor if you know one. Thanks
    MFW 2013 #146 Target £6000
    Sealed pot challenge 6 member #1663 / £167.76
    Sealed pot challenge 5 member #1663 / £153.19
  • bebewoo
    bebewoo Posts: 622 Forumite
    That's really sneaky to take on new staff with few employment rights then shortly after make the long termers redundant. Is that what happened?
  • emmita
    emmita Posts: 715 Forumite
    Its about too :(

    At risk letters have been sent to the pool (not me) but we have a similar situation with a temp being made permanent.....

    I just want to get my facts straight on what's OK to do.
    MFW 2013 #146 Target £6000
    Sealed pot challenge 6 member #1663 / £167.76
    Sealed pot challenge 5 member #1663 / £153.19
  • Employers often want to get rid of crap workers.
    If this is the case it is sensible to have "replacements" already lined up.

    Obviously this should "not be handled via redundancy"

    Not that I am suggesting this is behind any of the OPs situation.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.