We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Understanding Primary School Grades
Comments
-
This always confuses me - it's a ridiculous system, the higher the number the higher the grade, but the lower the letter the higher the grade! It's so counter-intuative, if A is better than B, then 1 should be better than 2!
This was why I posted, as using common sense to determine which end was up, wasn't working!!:D0 -
Agreed, but here, people like the loony chair of Ofsted reckons it should be 2 :eek: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-24823058Softasputty wrote: »It confuses me at times and I'm a teacher! The early years foundation stage profile which covers nursery and reception children is constantly changing and even more complex and does not link numerically to key stage 1 and 2. Nevertheless, Mr Gove and others are determined to make up formulas to try and make it fit without really knowing what they are talking about. I wish they'd be brave enough to follow other European countries who start formal schooling at 6.
Yes, all tick boxes rather than actually doing what in the kids' best interests. Our school had to have a split year group for a couple of years - reason was there were 35 kids in one year and 50 in the year above, with 3 teachers between them.We are encouraged to share academic levels with 6 and 7 years and give them targets for this, that and the other. Too much time is focused on testing and not teaching I'm afraid. :eek:
Common sense would say to have two classes of 25 in the higher year group and one for the 35 in the lower year, but this didn't tick the box of "thou shalt not have more than 30 children in a class". So they had to have a split year group which was far worse that having a few more kids of the same year in a class. But as long as the govt can use the sound bite of smaller class sizes to convince stupid people to vote for them, who cares?0 -
Please bear with me while I try to post a scanned image of something I typed out for parents at the school I work at... I will edit this line if I manage to upload the image.
DEBT FREE BY 60Starting Debt 21st August 2019 = £11,024
Debt at May 2022 = £5268Debt Free Challenge - To be debt free by August 20240 -
WOW! That's big! Sorry!!!DEBT FREE BY 60Starting Debt 21st August 2019 = £11,024
Debt at May 2022 = £5268Debt Free Challenge - To be debt free by August 20240
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards