IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Suggested POPLA appeal template - core points.

Options
124»

Comments

  • Guys_Dad wrote: »
    Note for Parking EYE cases.

    Parking Eye have a letter sent by their director that actually states that their costs per case are £53. That being the case, their £100 obviously contains an element of profit. The letter in question is here http://imgur.com/a/vzLDq

    A paragraph such as the following should be added in PE cases.

    Furthermore, I attach a letter from Parking Eye in correspondence with another case, that admits that their estimate of cost in each case is actually £53, including operating costs, and this that the charge they are seeking to impose in my case has a considerable element of profit as well as operating costs incorporated. By their own admission, therefore, It can not, be a true pre-estimate of loss”
    These 53 GBP per case seem to be a very high estimation:
    ParkingEye employs 160 people, manages 830 car parks and is forecasting profits of £8.1m on projected turnover of £25.8m in the year to 31 August 2014. The most recently filed accounts for ParkingEye at Companies House show that in the year to 31 August 2012 it had a turnover of £13.9m and an operating profit of £4.47m
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4811121
    So this means that they had costs of GBP 9.43m in the year to 31 Aug 2012 and their estimated costs in the year to 31 Aug 2014 will be GBP 17.7m. So their costs in the year between may be some 13 million GBP.

    On the other hand they have "bought" 725,657 keeper data from the DVLA between 1 Okt 2012 and 30 Sep 2013:
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4796479

    The costs per case should then be about 18 GBP.

    Of course this includes the running costs (erecting signals, installing maintaining ANPR), so their average "losses" should be even more smaller. And if the motorists pay up after the first letter, then the "loss" will be essentially smaller than the average loss.
  • Guys_Dad
    Guys_Dad Posts: 11,025 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Bumped the thread to highlight additional points added this month.
  • Thanks so much for your help.
    After reading this and some other threads on here I basically copied and pasted and slightly amended a successful appeal to POPLA regarding the same car park where I had got a ticket (town quay southampton) and got my appeal granted !!
    What a relief.
    Apparently the company hadn't even bothered to send a copy of their proof I had contravened the regulations to POPLA so my appeal was upheld.
    Thanks again
  • Well done - could you post up the POPLA decision and Assessor's name in the POPLA thread

    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4488337

    Thank you for the feedback.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.