Elucidating loquacious ingenuitive titillating entrepreneurial - Bubbs’ Babes :):):)

QPR10

To welcome back an old "friend" :mad:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nkb6jex6-80

redfox

lookinforabargain wrote: »

A little question if I may RF, but does it harm the thread when lots of people report or spam the same posts? As in, it's obviously bringing the thread to the the attention of the forum team again and giving them work if lots of reports are made, but do they see us as following the rules for doing that, or do they get annoyed with us?! Hope that makes sense, I know what I mean anyways! :rotfl:

I can't speak for them as they don't include the BGs in anything like that, so I don't honestly know.

I think that as long as you ignore the troll/AE (and they aren't that difficult to spot really) they may well go away of their own accord - after all without an 'audience' their sole purpose here is pointless. By doing that you may well find there is less need to report repeatedly.

3Dogs

davemorton

Sunshinemummy wrote: »

I just clicked on my front screen of the computer screen, which takes me to this site, and was told that I was banned forever as I had two accounts. I sent them a long e-mail, comparing and contrasting the terms and conditions.

I was clearly not in breach and had never been critical/ abusive/negative to anyone on here (I only do this when I am getting paid, but I have been smutty regularly, no payment needed for this!!).

There is a few points in the terms that our open to challenge (sorry cannot remember the correct word, it is in on my desk)

It was clear that one person had reported one of my posts, ignoring the conversation where I explained the very good and personal reason and that I was open and honest. But this is more a reflection of that individual, and I hope that they are able to critically reflect on their actions.

What I think is interesting is that the news was on the thread about 12 hours before I knew and I cannot figure out how people found out.

If I get sent to coventry again because of this post (please note - no terms and conditions have been breached) I would be following very formal procedures as I was quiet disappointed by the process.

Hey ho... my first and hopefully my last negative post!

Well you didnt hide the fact that you had another account. You explain to everyone why.

locarr

davemorton wrote: »

ehh? Explain please Locarr, I dont think I was having a go at all, it was a genuine question, so please dont try to make it sound like it wasnt. Please/thank you

Sorry Dave, I thought you was accusing SSM of being an AE....

I stand corrected

Sunshinemummy

rhosynbach wrote: »

no beer thanks teetotal but a nice cuppa and chocolate biscuit:D

I can do a cuppa and chocy biscuit (in fact I am drinking green tea with lemon at the moment!)

xx

frequent

Sunshinemummy wrote: »

I just clicked on my front screen of the computer screen, which takes me to this site, and was told that I was banned forever as I had two accounts. I sent them a long e-mail, comparing and contrasting the terms and conditions.

I was clearly not in breach and had never been critical/ abusive/negative to anyone on here (I only do this when I am getting paid, but I have been smutty regularly, no payment needed for this!!).

There is a few points in the terms that our open to challenge (sorry cannot remember the correct word, it is in on my desk)

It was clear that one person had reported one of my posts, ignoring the conversation where I explained the very good and personal reason and that I was open and honest. But this is more a reflection of that individual, and I hope that they are able to critically reflect on their actions.

What I think is interesting is that the news was on the thread about 12 hours before I knew and I cannot figure out how people found out.

If I get sent to coventry again because of this post (please note - no terms and conditions have been breached) I would be following very formal procedures as I was quiet disappointed by the process.

Hey ho... my first and hopefully my last negative post!

Some people have nothing better to do than look up other peoples posts...

emerald21

nikkilala wrote: »

It does the trick;)

Not if it's raining I ll bet

Tinyshoes

All I can say is I am glad I was out whoopsieing earlier. :eek:

I checked the Assam tea in my Extra, and the 50 bags are still scanning 69p, the 100s £1.29 for both old packaging and 100s new packaging £1.19, 50s new packaging are £1.49. :rotfl:

Not sure if this has been reported but found a lonely pack of Finest All Butter Scottish Shortbread Rounds with Belgian Chocolate Chunks in RTC section. No SEL so took them along to scanner and 42p. :j

Checked for more in the biscuit aisle, empty shelf with SEL £1.69 and it had an asterisk for discontinued line.

Barcode ends 4172.

Sunshinemummy

frequent wrote: »

Chill Locarr.

The more pressing question is why did SSM get a yellow card ?

Exactly! And DM is just asking what I am want to know!