We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bubble Warning from senior economist

1468910

Comments

  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    Trouble is that it appears the meds are to cure those that bought the illness upon themselves, whilst those that tried their best to avoid it are being forced to pay for the treatment.
    You're obviously one affected.

    Don't blame others for you making bad investment decisions.

    That can be called hypocrisy or hiding from the truth.
  • danothy
    danothy Posts: 2,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    TruckerT wrote: »
    My very limited aim in life is to ask the questions which others fail to do. I offer no answers.

    That sounds productive ...
    If you think of it as 'us' verses 'them', then it's probably your side that are the villains.
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    danothy wrote: »
    That sounds productive ...

    It is if others know the answers or shows up the fact that nobody actually does.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    You're obviously one affected.

    Don't blame others for you making bad investment decisions.

    That can be called hypocrisy or hiding from the truth.

    What you fail to accept that there are millions of people out there who by of age and circumstance rely on cash savings. To leverage property transaction or invest in equities and bonds would be reckless, even if they could find someone to lend them the money or greedy enough to recommend investments.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    What you fail to accept that there are millions of people out there who by of age and circumstance rely on cash savings. To leverage property transaction or invest in equities and bonds would be reckless, even if they could find someone to lend them the money or greedy enough to recommend investments.
    Oh I accept that but the usual suspects here would have preferred the economy to have collapsed, unemployment to have gone through the roof, the stock market to crash, house prices to crash and everything else linked to the wealth destruction that took place.

    If people preferred that, well it says a lot about either their understanding of the situation or the kind of person that they are.
  • TruckerT
    TruckerT Posts: 1,714 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    Oh I accept that but the usual suspects here would have preferred the economy to have collapsed, unemployment to have gone through the roof, the stock market to crash, house prices to crash and everything else linked to the wealth destruction that took place.

    If people preferred that, well it says a lot about either their understanding of the situation or the kind of person that they are.

    It is interesting that you accept that 'wealth destruction took place'.

    It would be equally interesting to hear your opinion about whose wealth suffered the greatest damage, and who has been most successful in recouping their losses.

    TruckerT
    According to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 4 November 2013 at 12:38AM
    What you fail to accept that there are millions of people out there who by of age and circumstance rely on cash savings. To leverage property transaction or invest in equities and bonds would be reckless,

    Indeed.

    But what you fail to accept is that their "savings" (actually, just a loan to the banks) was then used by those banks to fund commercial lending (much of which went bad), overseas expansions (much of which went bad), purchases of foreign RMBS (much of which went bad), etc.

    And yes, even UK residential mortgage lending......

    The overwhelmingly vast majority of which didn't go bad.

    But only because low rates saved the wider economy and prevented unemployment from reaching horrific European levels, allowed the banks to recapitalise thanks to record spreads on lending, and preventing those banks from defaulting on the loans that savers gave them.

    Instead of moaning about the return on your money, you should be thankful that you can still get a return of your money.

    There is no god given right to get risk free returns from savings that meet or beat inflation.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • grizzly1911
    grizzly1911 Posts: 9,965 Forumite
    Indeed.

    But what you fail to accept is that their "savings" (actually, just a loan to the banks) was then used by those banks to fund commercial lending (much of which went bad), overseas expansions (much of which went bad), purchases of foreign RMBS (much of which went bad), etc.

    And yes, even UK residential mortgage lending......

    The overwhelmingly vast majority of which didn't go bad.

    But only because low rates saved the wider economy and prevented unemployment from reaching horrific European levels, allowed the banks to recapitalise thanks to record spreads on lending, and preventing those banks from defaulting on the loans that savers gave them.

    Instead of moaning about the return on your money, you should be thankful that you can still get a return of your money.

    There is no god given right to get risk free returns from savings that meet or beat inflation.


    I am not moaning a good proportion of mine is not in cash.

    There are many elderley people and soon to be retired being taken for a ride.

    I am not one of the above BTW.

    There is no given right to borrow cheap money either or for tax payer guarantees.
    "If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....

    "big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham
  • There are many elderley people and soon to be retired being taken for a ride.

    How are they being taken for a ride?

    They get to store their money in a bank, risk free, and they still get paid for it.

    Less than they used to get paid, but it's risk free and we've just come through the biggest financial crisis in a century.

    When the economy picks up, they will get paid more.
    There is no given right to borrow cheap money either

    Indeed.

    But the returns from cheap lending are all that's available risk free.

    Savers are welcome to invest in riskier assets if they wish.
    or for tax payer guarantees.

    What, like the tax payer guarantees for the contents of savings accounts with banks?;)
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    TruckerT wrote: »
    It is interesting that you accept that 'wealth destruction took place'.

    It would be equally interesting to hear your opinion about whose wealth suffered the greatest damage, and who has been most successful in recouping their losses.

    TruckerT
    It's not very interesting at all it's a fact.

    The people that recouped their losses were probably the ones that took investment risks and definitely not the ones sitting on an Internet forum complaining that the global crisis and recovery wasn't distributed correctly.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.