We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Overpaying mortgage Vs investing?

124»

Comments

  • VoucherMan
    VoucherMan Posts: 2,806 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    atush wrote: »
    he needs to fix or switch at 4%. but he doesn't say the term and outstanding amt and LTV so we can't say for sure.
    I've still got 18 years left of a 25 year term.

    The other two are answered in post 13;)
    LTV somewhere between 60-75%

    Outstanding - updating next week - should be just below £46,000
  • Thrugelmir wrote: »
    There's no downside in securing ones own future. Before taking affordable risks. Everybody wants jam today. Whereas better returns are more often made by those who play a more prudent game.

    My view is the opposite

    The downside in not taking affordable risks is in the form of opportunities lost.

    Not everybody wants jam today at the expense of tomorrow. A understanding of deferred gratification is common.

    And how often, exactly, are better returns made by playing a prudent game? 1%, 10%, 100% of the time? How prudent? The most prudent course might to save up a lot of cash over many years, perhaps in an NS&I account, and finally to buy a modest flat or house clear and free in middle life. Would that represent the best return?
  • Marazan
    Marazan Posts: 142 Forumite
    VoucherMan wrote: »
    Possibly I misread or misunderstood. It was about a year ago I last looked at charges and a figure of £10 or £12 a transaction comes to mind. On a regular £250 a month deposit it was a bit off-putting.

    Charles Stanley Direct charge that on share dealing. For funds they charge £0 to buy/sell but a 0.25% per annum custody fee. This is their post RDR-position. At the moment, for a funds only investor they are the cheapest broker around for anyone drip feeding in money and has a total portfolio under about £20,000
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 18,930 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Marazan wrote: »
    Charles Stanley Direct charge that on share dealing. For funds they charge £0 to buy/sell but a 0.25% per annum custody fee. This is their post RDR-position. At the moment, for a funds only investor they are the cheapest broker around for anyone drip feeding in money and has a total portfolio under about £20,000

    At 0.25% they are exactly the same as Cavendish but Cavendish don't cover shares just funds.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Possibly I misread or misunderstood. It was about a year ago I last looked at charges and a figure of £10 or £12 a transaction comes to mind. On a regular £250 a month deposit it was a bit off-putting.

    Those sound like single share dealing fees? Maybe you should check with them again about fees for investing in funds instead?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.