We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Bank charges

Can I claim bank charges if I already been turned down by bank and ombudsman . They basically saying if I can afford to shop at next I not in hardship . ???

Comments

  • McKneff
    McKneff Posts: 38,857 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm with them, anyone in tru hardship either woundnt be buying new clothes anywhere and be trawling charity shops and car boot sales.
    make the most of it, we are only here for the weekend.
    and we will never, ever return.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,297 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    They basically saying if I can afford to shop at next I not in hardship . ???

    Which is fair enough. Your spending is analysed and they look for luxury and non-essential spending (such as mobile phones, pay tv and Next).
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • pooch
    pooch Posts: 828 Forumite
    Goober456 wrote: »
    Can I claim bank charges if I already been turned down by bank and ombudsman . .... ???

    No. The ombudsman is the end of the line I'm afraid.
  • Goober456 wrote: »
    Can I claim bank charges if I already been turned down by bank and ombudsman . They basically saying if I can afford to shop at next I not in hardship . ???

    A bit harsh, you can get some really cheap deals at Next, they must expect you to walk around like a tramp.

    Your only option left would be to take them to small claim court, all depends on how the charges were applied.
    Have a look at this it might help: -

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19511542
  • meer53
    meer53 Posts: 10,217 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    There are cheaper clothes shops than Next.
  • maxzorin wrote: »
    A bit harsh, you can get some really cheap deals at Next, they must expect you to walk around like a tramp.
    That's not the point though is it. We don't know how much was spent etc, it could be any clothing store. Depends how much was blown on clothes, when you're supposedly in financial hardship ie unable to pay your existing bills!
  • That's not the point though is it. We don't know how much was spent etc, it could be any clothing store. Depends how much was blown on clothes, when you're supposedly in financial hardship ie unable to pay your existing bills!

    We also don't know what condition their old clothes were in - if they had holes in or were torn etc then with the colder weather approaching it could be damaging to their health to not have adequate warm clothing on.

    Without proper clothing to keep warm a person can become ill.
  • maxzorin wrote: »
    A bit harsh, you can get some really cheap deals at Next, they must expect you to walk around like a tramp.

    Your only option left would be to take them to small claim court, all depends on how the charges were applied.
    Have a look at this it might help: -

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-19511542

    Are you suggesting that those who go to charity shops look like 'tramps'?
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I think the clothing argument is entirely separate to the OP's dilemma.
    Regardless, the OP's complaint is at an end if he/she has been rejected by both the Bank and the Ombudsman. I'm rather surprised the OP went to the Ombudsman, given that Bank charges are not routinely refunded and that Banks are only persuaded otherwise in hardship cases. Obviously the OP's definition of "hardship" is different to the Bank's.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.