We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Woodford to leave Invesco
Comments
-
Glen_Clark wrote: »I thought an ETF is Open Ended
So did I. Though they don't always hold the actual assets they are tracking, so you might have counterparty risks that you wouldn't have in a normal OEIC, active or passive. Not necessarily a problem but when something like Lehman can happen...
To be clear, I do have a couple of ETFs so I'm not trying to create panic!"Things are never so bad they can't be made worse" - Humphrey Bogart0 -
Glen_Clark wrote: »I thought an ETF is Open Ended
Er, I think I'm getting my acronyms mixed up, sorry :-S0 -
Shaolin_Monkey wrote: »I would think EDIN is still at a discount now or at least close to par, depending on how you want to value it:
Last I looked it was trading around 558p.
Still looks to be trading at around this price. 546p would have been a decent price to buy at this morning but interesting to note at the start of the year it was 486p. Hindsight is wonderful.0 -
A made up index sounds like an ETN not ETF. These are the ones that went to zero in 2008, but luckily AIG was bailed out so those people didnt lose it all but thats the risk.
Whats the premium on woodford related investment trusts. IF he leaves and market falls also it could be a buy as Im sure it'll benefit from his management even after he goes0 -
Yes but..
One of the claimed advantages of an index tracker is that it follows the market and so cannot perform unusually badly. If you look at the "index" the Vanguard fund follows you will see it's a privately commissioned artificial index based on undisclosed criteria designed to provide dividend income with good sector and share diversification. So its not clear that it bears any relationship to a real-world market.
Are such funds really trackers or are they simply automated investing where the manager's investment criteria and strategies are encapsulated in a computer program? ie a computerised active manager.
Does a little tracking error matter when its just as likely to produce small gains as small losses?
Or is this just overpaid fund managers criticizing their lower charging competitors?“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair0 -
I read the comments included from Dunston about the funds that Woodford manages unlikely to be affected so much until after the manager changes whereas the Edinburgh Investment Trust was instantly affected. I hold quite a few investment trusts and have often read articles comparing the pros and cons of investment trusts versus funds. But never has it been mentioned that announcement of change of manager will affect investments trusts far more instantly than funds. Just to clarify, the funds are likely to go down far more slowly because there is no rush for anyone to decide whether to continue to hold until much nearer the time as there isn't a premium to nav to be taken into account as with the Edinburgh Investment Trust? Is that right? Maybe I had better buy funds in future on those occasions where funds and ITs are mirrored.
PS
I do presume though that the funds are affected somewhat as I have read that some of the share prices in Woodfords funds have dropped eg Serco which is a major holding0 -
I'm new to all this investment game. What do people think of the IP distribution fund in light of Woodford going?0
-
moneylover wrote: »I read the comments included from Dunston about the funds that Woodford manages unlikely to be affected so much until after the manager changes whereas the Edinburgh Investment Trust was instantly affected. I hold quite a few investment trusts and have often read articles comparing the pros and cons of investment trusts versus funds. But never has it been mentioned that announcement of change of manager will affect investments trusts far more instantly than funds. Just to clarify, the funds are likely to go down far more slowly because there is no rush for anyone to decide whether to continue to hold until much nearer the time as there isn't a premium to nav to be taken into account as with the Edinburgh Investment Trust? Is that right? Maybe I had better buy funds in future on those occasions where funds and ITs are mirrored.
PS
I do presume though that the funds are affected somewhat as I have read that some of the share prices in Woodfords funds have dropped eg Serco which is a major holding
IP High Income was down 14p overnight - quite a drop. That is the Acc Version.0 -
moneylover wrote: »I read the comments included from Dunston about the funds that Woodford manages unlikely to be affected so much until after the manager changes whereas the Edinburgh Investment Trust was instantly affected. I hold quite a few investment trusts and have often read articles comparing the pros and cons of investment trusts versus funds. But never has it been mentioned that announcement of change of manager will affect investments trusts far more instantly than funds. Just to clarify, the funds are likely to go down far more slowly because there is no rush for anyone to decide whether to continue to hold until much nearer the time as there isn't a premium to nav to be taken into account as with the Edinburgh Investment Trust? Is that right? Maybe I had better buy funds in future on those occasions where funds and ITs are mirrored.
PS
I do presume though that the funds are affected somewhat as I have read that some of the share prices in Woodfords funds have dropped eg Serco which is a major holding
The IT can be sold at a premium or discount depending on supply and demand. Sentiment and opinion can affect the price. OEIC/UT is valued on the underlying assets. No sentiment or feeling is going to impact directly on the price. However, if there was a rush of people exiting the fund, then that could affect the price if sales were required to increase the cash holding. Especially if the inflows dried up.
The differences with ITs are often shown as positives and when things go well, they are. However, they can also be negatives and can work against you.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
A_Flock_Of_Sheep wrote: »IP High Income was down 14p overnight - quite a drop. That is the Acc Version.
You think 2% is "quite a drop" for a basket of shares? :rotfl: My other income funds are 1% down overnight. I'm panicking! :rotfl:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards