We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
CSA ....an (absent) and bitter Dads point of view
Comments
-
Do you think matters would improve if the RULE was that a NRP (who wasn't a criminal or untrustworthy) would ONLY pay CSA if the PWC allowed access to the child(ren) AND
a NRP had to pay an extra penalty if he/she refused to care for the child(ren).
This would
1) Reduce the number of NRPs who couldn't afford the money or stress involved with gaining access through the court.
2) Reduce the likelihood a bitter PWC refusing a NRP access.
3) Improve the likelihood the child(ren) would continue their relationship with NRP.
It's bribery, but it's a solid strategy
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards