We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
So if cheap houses are so good for the economy....
HAMISH_MCTAVISH
Posts: 28,592 Forumite
.....why are ministers being urged to "abandon Northern cities" which have some of the cheapest land and house prices in the UK?
Surely the North of England should be booming by now?
And Detroit should be the boomiest city in America?
Just sayin....:D
Surely the North of England should be booming by now?
And Detroit should be the boomiest city in America?
Just sayin....:D
“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”
0
Comments
-
Obviously this is a wind up, Even you must understand why the north is struggling compared to the rest of the UK?0
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: ».....why are ministers being urged to "abandon Northern cities" which have some of the cheapest land and house prices in the UK?
Surely the North of England should be booming by now?
And Detroit should be the boomiest city in America?
Just sayin....:D
If you have a regional economy based largely on unionised industries and mining, then elect some right-wing nutcase hell bent on destroying unionised industries and mining, then when you finally get rid of her put nothing in their place other than a few call centres, it can't come as much of a surprise when those regions fail to do well.
As I said in another post, those regions if they were allowed to actually compete on a level playing field could well be doing much better if they were unshackled from the dead hand of Westminster and it's London obsession, that has now turned most of the SE into a dormitory town.0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »If you have a regional economy based largely on unionised industries and mining, then elect some right-wing nutcase hell bent on destroying unionised industries and mining, then when you finally get rid of her put nothing in their place other than a few call centres, it can't come as much of a surprise when those regions fail to do well.
If you have a regional economy based largely on unionised industries and mining, permanently on strike, hell bent on destroying these industries, then when you finally get rid of the unions, nothing will go in their place other than a few call centres, it can't come as much of a surprise when those regions fail to do well.0 -
Our economy would be in so much better shape if we were mining loads of coal and exporting it to China, about the only place left with high demand for it, maybe they'd rather buy British coal at 5x+ the price they can mine their own0
-
Well, er, you see
FACT.0 -
Our economy would be in so much better shape if we were mining loads of coal and exporting it to China, about the only place left with high demand for it, maybe they'd rather buy British coal at 5x+ the price they can mine their own
Given the current angst about UK energy prices, maybe we should re-open the mines, and try to dominate the world economy like we used to in the good old days.
TruckerTAccording to Clapton, I am a totally ignorant idiot.0 -
Loughton_Monkey wrote: »If you have a regional economy based largely on unionised industries and mining, permanently on strike, hell bent on destroying these industries, then when you finally get rid of the unions, nothing will go in their place other than a few call centres, it can't come as much of a surprise when those regions fail to do well.
That's one of the most ridiculous, serious posts I've yet seen on these boards.
Those on strike were not hell bent on destroying the industries, but I would assume you would rather they worked purely to throw some crumbs to their children in place of a normal meal at tea time. Afterall, they couldn't afford much more, hence why going on strike.
Feel free to thank me with your "Complete Nonsense" username, which is rather amusing, but rather worrying that you are spending so much time doing this sort of stuff.0 -
Many people won't get this, it will fly over their heads and they will froth at the mouth while they type an angry illogical response.Loughton_Monkey wrote: »If you have a regional economy based largely on unionised industries and mining, permanently on strike, hell bent on destroying these industries, then when you finally get rid of the unions, nothing will go in their place other than a few call centres, it can't come as much of a surprise when those regions fail to do well.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
