Extra I'll change the title later when I can think of something cool enough!

savingbabs

frequent wrote: »

Was just wondering about people who don't have dentists

The odontologists can identify against a photo with as little as 3 teeth apparently, was told this at a study day yesterday

frequent

Sunshinemummy wrote: »

Don't laugh it took me a while to click it was not a proper link!

:o:o

It's taken you even longer to realise it is a proper link :eek:

I'd call that 1 1 :rotfl:

Sunshinemummy

frequent wrote: »

Yes, mse has a system of making shortened links not work

If you really want to know about shortened links ( that are not allowed :rotfl:) google ad fly.

I googled and got

'Short links are useful both for space-constrained (e.g. microblogging, mobile) and manual entry (e.g. printed, spoken) applications, however URL shortening services are causing problems of their own (e.g. linkrot, analytics, security, etc.).

The rel="shortlink" proposal (which is made available with copyright, patent and trademark waivers) solves this problem cleanly, with little or no risk of collateral damage.

The proposed alternative (rev="canonical") also has numerous problems (e.g. HTML 5 deprecation of "rev", taking rather than giving canonical-ness, dangerous failure modes resulting in SEO problems, etc.). Furthermore the rel="shorturl" alternative is both confusing with many permutations (short_url, shorturl, shorturi, etc.) and affected by intellectual property issues (copyright protected specification, trademark status claimed by shorturl.com, unknown patent status). This is a genuine effort to make the web a better place.'

It is way beyond my brain capacity to actually read to the end of this, never mind understand it! It is probably a good thing as I can be a little bit rebellious just for the sake of it!

;);)

frequent

savingbabs wrote: »

The odontologists can identify against a photo with as little as 3 teeth apparently, was told this at a study day yesterday

That still only works if the person has dental records with photo's to compare against.

Sunshinemummy

frequent wrote: »

It's taken you even longer to realise it is a proper link :eek:

I'd call that 1 1 :rotfl:

Stop playing with me... I am off back to try again!

TrulyMadly

Cereal_Shopper wrote: »

Another lurker popping in to donate to a very worthwhile cause. Thanks everyone for all your hard work in finding and posting all the glitches.

Hello CEreal shopper:wave::wave:

Hope you will stick around:T

Sunshinemummy

frequent wrote: »

That still only works if the person has dental records with photo's to compare against.

Also does the data protection act mean that the records cannot be kept indefinitely?

Cashlesslassie

I think most of us if not ALL of us could choose to afford to buy a mate a nice cup of coffee in a coffee shop, possibly even a slice o cake if we are feeling kind

Having cancer isnt a choice, very few of us will be lucky enough not to be affected by this horrible disease, very few of us wont go through the pain or loss of watching our loved ones fight or indeed battling ourselves. Instead of a coffee and a cake this week why not chuck a fiver into the pot. We are all SO lucky, surely we can afford to spread the love and help someone out. x

https://mydonate.bt.com/fundraisers/logiemse

Saversue

[QUOTE=henrik777;63366248]Flora cuisine £1.98 v T £1 so great filler.

12 crispy dippers £1.62 v £1 T 9p filler after apg

Amongst the best cashback fillers :money:[/QUOTE]

I really must get my eyes checked - scanning and read that as
Florida Cruise £1.98 :rotfl:was about to check my Passport.

Sunshinemummy

Sunshinemummy wrote: »

Stop playing with me... I am off back to try again!

Nope, I cannot get it to work!