We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
driving girlfriends insured car-add my name to policy or not?
Comments
-
You, and I expect most other people read the post as intended. Both the op and their partner are insured to drive each others cars and was asking about the benefit of being a named driver. Instead of helpfully adding to my comment, Quentin is choosing to be officious.I read Norman's post differently.
The OP asked whether DOC meant he didn't have to add each other as a named driver.
Norman's reply I took as: DOC is TPO, named driver is same as full policy cover. Therefore if don't just want DOC, need to add as named drivers.0 -
This thread does seem to have wandered from the original question.
What you can and cannot do will be defined on the policy.
The OP does need to be aware that if he and his girlfriend drive one another's cars on their personal policies the cover will almost certainly be third party only (as said elsewhere on this thread). That is not a problem if you have a banger which you only have TP cover on anyway but if you have a new vehicle (particularly if there is credit outstanding on it) it is not something you should contemplate.
If they are living together, they need to check not only that vehicles belonging to members of the same household are not excluded from driving other vehicles cover but that their respective insurers are aware that they have access to another vehicle. Whilst it is probably not going to be an issue if the situation arose part way through the year they will almost certainly want to know at renewal.0 -
spacey2012 wrote: »In the real world, the police do not give two monkeys, if they even mildly suspect you have no insurance, they will lift the car.
This is well off topic now, but I can assure that that police officers are regularly reminded that the MID database is not gospel truth, and that they must follow the legislation before seizing a car.
Law abiding citizens who have car insurance tend to get very very annoyed when their car is taken away unlawfully, and have a habit of taking the matter further. If mine was seized illegally, the next stop after writing a detailed complaint would be to see a solicitor about getting damages for unlawful property interference (and the cost of hiring a car).
I imagine that the frequency of reminders about the legislation would match very closely the frequency of claims against the police on this issue;)We need the earth for food, water, and shelter.
The earth needs us for nothing.
The earth does not belong to us.
We belong to the Earth0 -
Thank you all very much for the responses to my thread. I think in the case of doubt it's probably going to be best for us to contact our insurers and ask them outright if we're covered. Third party insurance isn't a term I really understood before making the thread, I'm now much more informed. Thanks for enlightening me.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards