📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Setting up LTD company with 50/50 share..

2»

Comments

  • greyteam1959
    greyteam1959 Posts: 4,730 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I would seek proper professional advice before this come back to bite your *ss bigtime.
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    My only addition is are you *certain* you want *exactly* 50/50 split? It can lead to deadlocks. Even if you give one share (class which won't receive dividends) to someone you both trust to arbitrate and take 49 each - at least you have someone to stop deadlocks.
  • bowlingo
    bowlingo Posts: 152 Forumite
    paddyrg wrote: »
    My only addition is are you *certain* you want *exactly* 50/50 split? It can lead to deadlocks. Even if you give one share (class which won't receive dividends) to someone you both trust to arbitrate and take 49 each - at least you have someone to stop deadlocks.

    Hello paddy..

    Yes definitely looking at a straight down the middle 50/50 split..I apreciate it can cause problems regarding decisions etc...I have no problem setting it up as a 50/50 thing as long as we are both fully 50/50 liable and not sure if this is actually possible....
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    As a limited company the company is liable, not the shareholders. Directors can become liable if they are negligent in their duties, but they are not otherwise normally liable for company debts, etc. This is why I'm anxious that you're pushing into this without a full understanding of what you're setting up.

    Also, understand that if you were jointly and severally liable for debts say in a partnership, it doesn't mean you're both liable for 50% of a debt, you're both responsible for 100% of it. The creditor can come after both or either of the parties for the full amount (usually the one most likely to pay).

    What exactly are you trying to achieve and why? You should take advice from an accountant regarding company formation and a lawyer regarding liabilities and getting the structure you want, but at the moment I'm just concerned that you have a mistaken assumption which might lead you down the wrong path.
  • I don't think the OP has got a clue about what they are trying to do.
    Sanctimonious Veggie. GYO-er. Seed Saver. Get in.
  • earthstorm
    earthstorm Posts: 2,134 Forumite
    A director will be liable for the amount they hold in shares, (shares are usually valued at £1) when you set up a limited company, so if you only hold 1 share then you are liable for £1 and that's all.
    A director is an employee of the Limited Company.
  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,432 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    earthstorm wrote: »
    A director will be liable for the amount they hold in shares, (shares are usually valued at £1) when you set up a limited company, so if you only hold 1 share then you are liable for £1 and that's all.
    A director is an employee of the Limited Company.
    Notwithstanding this, I'm with paddy in suggesting that the OP should get proper (ie paid for) advice which he can rely on if he feels he has more to lose than his partner / fellow director.
    Signature removed for peace of mind
  • earthstorm
    earthstorm Posts: 2,134 Forumite
    Savvy_Sue wrote: »
    Notwithstanding this, I'm with paddy in suggesting that the OP should get proper (ie paid for) advice which he can rely on if he feels he has more to lose than his partner / fellow director.

    Yes i would agree as the way he is posting, he does not fully understand business entities and where liabilities lie.

    what i listed is the info i received when i set up a limited company (although i am the only director)
  • Atidi
    Atidi Posts: 943 Forumite
    I don't think the OP has got a clue about what they are trying to do.

    Oh, I think they know exactly what they are doing ... and probably having a right giggle to themselves too :cool:
  • greyteam1959
    greyteam1959 Posts: 4,730 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    paddyrg wrote: »
    As a limited company the company is liable, not the shareholders. Directors can become liable if they are negligent in their duties, but they are not otherwise normally liable for company debts, etc. This is why I'm anxious that you're pushing into this without a full understanding of what you're setting up.

    Also, understand that if you were jointly and severally liable for debts say in a partnership, it doesn't mean you're both liable for 50% of a debt, you're both responsible for 100% of it. The creditor can come after both or either of the parties for the full amount (usually the one most likely to pay).

    What exactly are you trying to achieve and why? You should take advice from an accountant regarding company formation and a lawyer regarding liabilities and getting the structure you want, but at the moment I'm just concerned that you have a mistaken assumption which might lead you down the wrong path.

    As I said..................
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.