We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Satisfied CCJ still killing my credit rating
Options
Comments
-
The obvious answer being it will otherwise remain on record for another 4 years.
Exactly. The court may question why you delayed, but are fairly receptive to normal reasons. For example that you just were not aware that you could apply for a set aside in the first place.Still rolling rolling rolling......<
SIGNATURE - Not part of post0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Wrong perspective. Put yourself in the position of convincing a court. The elapsed time does nothing to support the application.
Plus there is a benefit to be gained from a set aside after 2 years. Courts do not set out to be unreasonable and I cannot see that the time should prejudice OP seeking a set aside if he so choosesYou might as well ask the Wizard of Oz to give you a big number as pay a Credit Referencing Agency for a so-called 'credit-score'0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Use mail redirection.
Perhaps rereading my original post will inform you of why this did not happen.
Thank you all for the kind advice, it is much appreciated.0 -
There is no formal time limit on set aside AFAIK - unlike the creditor who has 6 years. If the creditor has 6 years, then it is not unreasonable to be seeking a set aside after 2 years.
Plus there is a benefit to be gained from a set aside after 2 years. Courts do not set out to be unreasonable and I cannot see that the time should prejudice OP seeking a set aside if he so chooses
In the broadest terms there would still have to be an explanation as why the debt was totally "forgotten". A CCJ is a last resort collection method. In making application the plantiff has to satisfy the judge that all other avenues have been exhausted. So it's not a question of the serving of the CCJ in isolation.0 -
Utter nonsense. If you don't respond to the claim forms then there is no need to satisfy a judge of anything. A judge doesn't even see the case or claim. The CCJ is just issued in default by the court staff. By doing this they get away with the vaguest POCs you could imagine.
That is how many CCJ are obtained by creditors or debt collectors. A favourite tactic is sending to a previous address, where they think there is a good chance the defendant will never know about the CCJ application until after default judgement has been issued by the court staff.Still rolling rolling rolling......<
SIGNATURE - Not part of post0 -
rizla_king wrote: »A favourite tactic is sending to a previous address, where they think there is a good chance the defendant will never know about the CCJ application until after default judgement has been issued by the court staff.
Many people think that disappearing off the face of the earth is a way of avoiding paying due debts.Utter nonsense
Still doesn't address the point about a debtor knowing that they owe the money. Spin it anyway you like. The way of tackling the issue is communicating with the creditor. Avoidance in any form is bound to cause more stress in the longer term.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards