Premium Bond Syndicate Agreement

Does anybody have a written agreement in place for a premium bond syndicate?
Looking to put something into writing and could do with some advice to what it should contain.

Thanks.:beer:
«13456

Comments

  • Joining money together with anyone else usually ends up in heartache. Wouldn't it be better for you all to hold them in your own names and if you win have an unwritten rule it will be shared out or there abouts?
    :T:T :beer: :beer::beer::beer: to the lil one :) :beer::beer::beer:
  • Unfortunately this isn't an option and one person will be managing the bonds.
  • innovate
    innovate Posts: 16,217 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You cannot hold a Premium Bond account as a syndicate. It must be the account of an individual.

    Why would you want a syndicate, out of interest?
  • andybrock
    andybrock Posts: 146 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 23 September 2013 at 7:53PM
    I fully understand the regulations regarding Premium Bonds-ie can only be held by an individual
    Many people who form a premium bond syndicate have one person managing the fund and a written agreement in place.
    This is what I am looking for.
  • innovate
    innovate Posts: 16,217 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 23 September 2013 at 7:20PM
    What is there to manage with Premium Bonds? I have 30,000 of them and they don't need any more management than a plain savings account. Would you also have syndicates for savings accounts?
  • Its about making a declaration of trust (i.e. the creation of a bare trust) confirming your common understanding that each syndicate member enjoys an equal beneficial ownership of the bonds, and an equal entitlement to any prizes.

    Otherwise the person who manages the fund can just pocket the money.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    By 'managing the premium bonds' the OP clearly means being the nominated person in whose name they are held.

    So far as NSI are concerned, PBs cannot be held by a syndicate (unlike the National Lottery I believe).

    But that does not mean a group of people cannot make an agreement that any prizes from a defined number of bonds will be shared equally.

    If trust is not an issue, a clear statement listing the bonds, and the people, and signed by all, should suffice.

    If each person in the group held, say £1000 worth of bonds, then the trust would be mutual (rather than relying on one person to collect the money and invest it all in his name on the group's behalf).

    Alternatively you could get a solicitor to draw up a Deed to make it more formal.
  • Thanks GM.
    Confirmed exactly what I thought.
    Just wondered whether there was anything out there available.
  • Sampong
    Sampong Posts: 870 Forumite
    Forming a syndicate to increase your holding won't increase your expected return. Each premium bond has an equeal chance of winning, so "your" bonds have as much chance of winning as anyone else in the "syndicate".

    Of course with a larger holding (because of the syndicate) it increases the chances if a win more often, but this is offset by the fact that you have to divide the prizes between all members.

    In fact, by forming a syndicate, you increase your risk of problems, for example if there is a problem with the agreement and the winning member decides to keep the funds. Technically speaking, that has the potential to reduce your expected return from the investment.

    You can't leverage this investment.
  • Sampong wrote: »
    Forming a syndicate to increase your holding won't increase your expected return. Each premium bond has an equeal chance of winning, so "your" bonds have as much chance of winning as anyone else in the "syndicate".

    Of course with a larger holding (because of the syndicate) it increases the chances if a win more often, but this is offset by the fact that you have to divide the prizes between all members.

    In fact, by forming a syndicate, you increase your risk of problems, for example if there is a problem with the agreement and the winning member decides to keep the funds. Technically speaking, that has the potential to reduce your expected return from the investment.

    You can't leverage this investment.


    That's why a suitable agreement is necessary.;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 349.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453K Spending & Discounts
  • 242.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 619.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.4K Life & Family
  • 255.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.