We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Reality check
Comments
-
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »We'll be in a recovery when stimulus stops being thrown at the economy. At this current stage we are still ADDING stimulus.
The FED are said to have made things worse by not tapering. Yet you seem to think this can be seen as the end of something.
We're pumped full of drugs to remove the effects. Were not recovering, though I understand your definition will be very different and something we will never ever agree on.
The problem with your definition is that it's difficult to quantify, measure and therefore monitor. Unless there are some numbers attached to it then you become the sole arbiter of the recovery.
Better to look at more accepted measurements of the economy - GDP, debt, confidence surveys, wage rises, household income, unemployment etc.
It's tentative and there's a chance it can go backwards but you're just in denial if you think it's not happening.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »We'll be in a recovery when stimulus stops being thrown at the economy. At this current stage we are still ADDING stimulus.
Surely you mean we will have recovered when the stimulus stops. QE has helped the recovery. There was talk of tapering because things are on the move. You are one of the biggest "we aren't recovering" merchants, so I would have thought not tapering would have your full agreement!Graham_Devon wrote: »The FED are said to have made things worse by not tapering. Yet you seem to think this can be seen as the end of something.
Said by whom? The Stock Markets all loved it.Graham_Devon wrote: »We're pumped full of drugs to remove the effects. Were not recovering, though I understand your definition will be very different and something we will never ever agree on.
Here we go. "We are not recovering". Put that in your signature if you dare. Advertise to the world that you live on a different sad planet from everyone else.0 -
Did you know that denial isn't a river in Egypt?Graham_Devon wrote: »Were not recovering, though I understand your definition will be very different and something we will never ever agree on.0 -
-
As the government still has rising borrowing needs. We are far from a decent level of employment. A massive time bomb of government sector pension promises. Also huge personal debt.
I certainly will not get too carried away on a new economic boom. More like lagh my socks off at the whole concept.0 -
It was interesting to read recently that the boss of Tesco believes the era of cheap food plucked from far flung parts of the globe is coming to an end.
The reason? Supermarket chains like Tesco are now having to compete with new consumers from China and elsewhere. Competition for finite resources will push up prices.
If you then correlate this experience with a report on 5Live yesterday discussing world population growing to a peak of 9 or 10 billion, it's hard not to imagine even more competition for relatively finite resources.
It's hard not to imagine new challenges ahead.0 -
It was interesting to read recently that the boss of Tesco believes the era of cheap food plucked from far flung parts of the globe is coming to an end.
The reason? Supermarket chains like Tesco are now having to compete with new consumers from China and elsewhere. Competition for finite resources will push up prices.
If you then correlate this experience with a report on 5Live yesterday discussing world population growing to a peak of 9 or 10 billion, it's hard not to imagine even more competition for relatively finite resources.
It's hard not to imagine new challenges ahead.
Don't worry, the futures bright, the futures.................lab burgers.
http://news.yahoo.com/first-reaction-lab-made-burger-short-flavor-134528570.html0 -
Better to look at more accepted measurements of the economy - GDP, debt, confidence surveys, wage rises, household income, unemployment etc.
That would be fine if there were any measures that mean anything. Bernanke is back peddaling on when unemployment numbers will be good enough. Carney tossed a figure in that may now be variable depending on other factors.
GDP growth isn't necessarily good if it is fuelled by debt and the balance of trade is worsening.
Wage rises aren't much good if they are chasing or lagging inflation. If inflation is out of control of UK plc, which most appears to be what then?
Unemployment may be falling but if well paid skilled roles are disappearing and being replaced by part time, temporary, zero hours with poor wages,and little in the way in prospects or benefits we are simply storing up a bigger problem for the most of the country.
We are educating more and more individuals but we now have education inflation. A degree is almost becoming loose change these days, so many people have one.
The finance sector appeared to pull us through the 90s and early 00s but it was built on sand. Whether it ever grows and provides the income to balance out again who knows."If you act like an illiterate man, your learning will never stop... Being uneducated, you have no fear of the future.".....
"big business is parasitic, like a mosquito, whereas I prefer the lighter touch, like that of a butterfly. "A butterfly can suck honey from the flower without damaging it," "Arunachalam Muruganantham0 -
grizzly1911 wrote: »That would be fine if there were any measures that mean anything. Bernanke is back peddaling on when unemployment numbers will be good enough. Carney tossed a figure in that may now be variable depending on other factors.
So what are we left with? The Devon Index?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards