We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Amazon Credit Card
Comments
-
Hi - an update for you.
I sent MBNA a copy of the letter that Principality provided us with, confirming that the mortgage was a joint tennant mortgage.
We have today had a letter off MBNA, stating that the account will be terminated in November. They then go on to say that the full balance will then be payable in full.
What do you propose our next step could be? Is it worth contacting the Ombudsmen?0 -
There is no next step. The account is closed, they have no legitimate expectation of being paid from the estate. Anything they tell you to the contrary is in the hope someone will make a payment regardless of this. Have a happy life and move on, if they continue to contact you make a formal complaint and then take it to the ombudsman. I don't think they will however.Graduated 16 July 2013 with First Class Honours :jHouse Deposit: £6,493.10 - Cashback Total: £447.670
-
How the house was owned, joint tenants or tenants in common, has nothing to do with the mortgage company.
What matters is what is recorded at the land registry.
MBNA have searched the land registry and have most likely found a "form A restriction" on the property title. This most likely means the house was held as tenants in common and a proportion of the equity is part of the deceased's estate. If so MBNA do have a claim on the estate.
http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/public/guides/public-guide-18
Even if the property was held as joint tenants and the estate was insolvent they could still make a claim.
http://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/CaseHelpManual/D/DeceasedInsolvents.htm0 -
How the house was owned, joint tenants or tenants in common, has nothing to do with the mortgage company.
What matters is what is recorded at the land registry.
MBNA have searched the land registry and have most likely found a "form A restriction" on the property title. This most likely means the house was held as tenants in common and a proportion of the equity is part of the deceased's estate. If so MBNA do have a claim on the estate.
http://www.landregistry.gov.uk/public/guides/public-guide-18
Even if the property was held as joint tenants and the estate was insolvent they could still make a claim.
http://www.insolvencydirect.bis.gov.uk/CaseHelpManual/D/DeceasedInsolvents.htm
if you take a mortgage out as 'Joint Tenants' why would the land registry say different? I'm confused..0 -
The mortgage is irrelevant.
The ownership of the house is what matters.
See section 3.2 of the land registry document I linked to above to obtain a copy of the transfer form used when the house was purchased or obtain a copy from the conveyancer used. The form will record the ownership.
If the house was recorded owned as tenants in common then your sister has more serious problems if her partner died intestate the portion of the house he owned would not pass to her.
Was there a will? Who is the executor? Have letters of administration/probate been obtained?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards