We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

County Court Claim - help

<THIS IS A REPOST FROM THE MOTORING SECTION - Thank you for all the helpful advice members have given me so far.>

I wondered if anyone could help me understand if I have a reasonable chance to defend a County Court case (breach of contract is the claim).

The CC Claim I have received and that I intend to defend involves my car (I am the keeper) when it was not being driven by me and I was not a passenger.

The private land parking claim against me relates to parking at a hospital in early August 2012, before Section 56 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 commenced effect on 1 October 2012.

There was a letter from Apcoa claiming £90 on 29/9/12 then two letters from both a solicitor and debt collector with very similar addresses in November 2012, then suddenly today a County Court Claim

I foolishly had ignored all the correspondence until today, not being aware of the change in the law and am temped (under pressure from my wife) to pay them to go away. Do the judges in the CCs still accept that there is no contract with the RK which can be breached unless the RK is the driver?

Thank you

Simon

Comments

  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Why are are reposting this here. As explained, it should be on the Parking sub-forum.
  • spacey2012
    spacey2012 Posts: 5,836 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Knew this would happen when the BPA magazine reported Parking Eye had increased payment rates to 85% with using social media and forums to promote the negative sides of failing to pay the initial charge.
    Be happy...;)
  • Johno100
    Johno100 Posts: 5,259 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    spacey2012 wrote: »
    Knew this would happen when the BPA magazine reported Parking Eye had increased payment rates to 85% with using social media and forums to promote the negative sides of failing to pay the initial charge.

    If this was a glove puppet then you wouldn't think they would post a 'story' which would highlight that PoFA is not retrospective and the PPC therefore can't proceed by default against the RK for a ticket issued prior to October 2012.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.