NOW OPEN: the MSE Forum 'Ask An Expert' event. This time we'd like your questions on TRAVEL & HOLIDAY DEALS. Post by Wed and deals expert MSE Oli will answer as many as he can.

Would you apply for a card you despise? Poll Discussion

in MoneySaving polls
32 replies 3.4K views
There's a best credit card on the market (head and shoulders above all others) which pays the most cashback for those who are debt free, and has the best balance transfer deal for those in debt. Yet it's branded with your favourite football team's rival/the Masters of Foxhounds association/the League Against Cruel Sports (whichever one you find most distasteful). Would you still apply for the card?

A. Absolutely. It benefits me, that's what counts

B. No way. My club/beliefs are much more important than my financial benefit

Please vote here or click reply to discuss. :smiley:
threadbanner.gif
«134

Replies

  • If it was for my favourite football teams rival, yes I would apply I don't care that much.

    If it was something I was morally against like the masters of foxhounds I certainly would not.
    If you don't like what I say slap me around with a large trout and PM me to tell me why.

    If you do like it please hit the thanks button.
  • spanditspandit Forumite
    150 Posts
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Forumite
    I would probably say yes, as if this card was the best cashback card, I'd be getting the most amount of money out of a company that I despised. I feel that it would be a double whammy as I'd be getting the benefit from a company that deserves to be screwed.

    For those in debt, it would only be worth it if the company didn't get any income from you, such as a fee-free 0% balance transfer. This is exactly what I did when a bank messed me around a few years ago. After I got it sorted I applied for their 0% balance transfer and made sure they made 0 profit from me!
    If you find my post helpful please press the THANKS button.
  • vansboyvansboy Forumite
    6.5K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    I'd apply for the card...& NOT use it, so as to create a (tiny) expense for them!!

    Then they'd have less funds for the cause I didn't support.

    It'd need to be something I was really against, rather than just a dislike, though.

    VB
  • Yes. It's business not personal.
  • You wouldn't cost the organisation whose name is on the card money by them making no interest from you, it would cost the bank/card company operating the card money.

    If the organisation receives a percentage of what you spend you might not make them anything but if they earn a percentage on balance transfers too you might end up making them money even if you don't use it. They may even earn a fixed commission for you signing up.
    If you don't like what I say slap me around with a large trout and PM me to tell me why.

    If you do like it please hit the thanks button.
  • jat100jat100 Forumite
    178 Posts
    If it was for my favourite football teams rival, yes I would apply I don't care that much.

    If it was something I was morally against like the masters of foxhounds I certainly would not.


    My views exactly. I voted no.
  • CCCeleCCCele Forumite
    218 Posts
    > If it was for my favourite football teams rival, yes I would apply I don't care that much.

    The non-hypothetical answer: Football club backed cards are never very good rates and the club gets any premiums rather than you. Chances are most clubs would have the same deal anyway, since most issue the same cards. A card that gives any premiums to someone else is never going to be the best value card.

    The hypothetical answer: I would not go for it as any benefits go to something I am against.
  • There is a sliding scale for me. The two choices in the poll are very black and white... whereas real life isn't!

    I DO strongly believe in the power of my spending to influence others for better or worse. I voted for B) No.

    However, it is only "no" on issues I feel strongly against. However, some issues (like football!) are neither here nor there!

    However, it often works the other way though, that you get a worse rate to support something you believe in...

    Most time, the charity credit cards are MUCH worse rates than getting the highest paying cashback card. It is normally better to get the top cashback payer, then you could then give the resulting larger pot of money to the charity you wanted to support. You have to step back and consider the bigger picture and still be wise with your spending!

    I do however bank with smile, (part of the cooperative bank), as they have a strict financial policy of what they will and won't do with your money. This makes me happier. Banking with the top payers, wouldn't be able to replace that feeling for me, even if I had a bit more interest as a result! This is an ethical choice. I like to know what my money is being used for.

    Another example would be buying fairtrade produce where available.

    The small amount extra to pay, is worth it for the final outcome.

    Mike
  • Mics_chickMics_chick Forumite
    12K Posts
    If it was for my favourite football teams rival, yes I would apply I don't care that much.

    If it was something I was morally against like the masters of foxhounds I certainly would not.

    I don't know if the Fox-hunting/Cruel sports options were mentioned to "appeal" to people who don't care about any sports team or to show the 2 possible ends of the scale ??? :confused:

    I understand people can feel very very passionately about football/rugby/etc but in my view they don't have any particular impact either way. Whereas the Fox-hunting/Cruel sports options could be used politically by those particular organisations. That's why I voted 'no way' - I would not support any sort of potentially political organisation in this way...
    You should never call somebody else a nerd or geek because everybody (even YOU !!!) is an
    "anorak" about something whether it's trains, computers, football, shoes or celebs :p :rotfl:
  • plonkeeplonkee Forumite
    86 Posts
    I wouldn't take out a card that was against my beliefs - mostly because I don't think I could bring myself to use it so that would be counter-productive (I don't carry a balance).
    thoughts on personal finance @ plonkee.com
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Energy Price Cap change

Martin Lewis on what it means for you

MSE News

Best £1 you've ever spent?

Share your most impressive bargains

MSE Forum