We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Did you have to pay for revision guides?

13»

Comments

  • Spendless
    Spendless Posts: 25,118 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    The price includes 3 workbooks too, though I don't even know what that is.
  • peachyprice
    peachyprice Posts: 22,346 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I have them at home, there's a separate one each for chemistry, biology and physics.
    Accept your past without regret, handle your present with confidence and face your future without fear
  • Should be optional, not required to buy them. Personally as a Science tutor, I can honestly say that a lot of the study guides are terrible! They are good for someone who just wants to pass, but for anyone looking to gain an A*, A or B - they don't go into nearly enough detail and over simplify things. Don't feel obliged to buy them unless the school are doing certain exercises from them or basing their homework on them.

    Obviously this depends what exam board you are doing, there are some good study guides I have used for our local exam board, CCEA but in general I think they're a waste of money. Best printing out the past papers for free, attempting the questions and if you can't answer them or aren't gaining very high marks - go back over the areas you need to revise.
  • Savvy_Sue
    Savvy_Sue Posts: 47,798 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Somewhere in the back of my mind there's a distant memory of some legal ruling that says schools can't charge pupils to rent/loan anything, it came to light at our school when they wanted to charge an annual rental fee for lockers, which they then had to abolish because it was illegal.
    Schools can't insist on charging for anything which pupils are required to have or do, I believe. (obviously uniform is an exception, although there are now limitations on that.)

    So anything 'required' for the curriculum ought to be FOC.

    But by wording it as a voluntary contribution, they get round it. Whether or not you'd get the guides if you didn't pay, and whether or not every pupil at the boys' old school gets the planner regardless of whether or not they pay £3, I'm not sure.
    Signature removed for peace of mind
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.