We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Can landlord restrict size of TV I use?

1235

Comments

  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    BobQ wrote: »
    Yes of course it is, but if everyone said sod the rules the accommodation would probably not suit any of them. The most likely reason for the restriction is the electrical load. If everyone installs electrical devices that do not comply, they would no doubt moan if the circuit breakers tripped every hour and that would help nobody.

    He probably has a common law right to install a camping stove but I do not think it should be allowed.

    He doesn't, but if he did, they couldnt 'not allow it'.
  • Naf
    Naf Posts: 3,183 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ValHaller wrote: »
    Hairdryers using more energy than TV's? 0.1 hours of hair drying at 1 kW is 0.1kWh. 10 hours of TV at 150W is 1.5kWh. I think you are comparing apples with oranges to get an answer in bananas.

    But the hair dryer has a higher load. The poster wasn't comparing energy consumption, but power rating. The hair dryer uses more energy per second & so puts a higher load onto the room's electrics than a TV.

    ValHaller wrote: »
    At some level, there will always be a restriction on the supply available in a room. Clearly if a student is into electric welding, a 13 Amp welder may be feasible, a 30 Amp welder is pushing it and a 40 Amp welder is out of the question. Underlying this is a technical limitation. No one would challenge this as unreasonable.

    Similarly there may be underlying technical reasons related to the diversity of the load - irons may be diverse in that not all students will iron simultaneously - but they could all watch TV simultaneously. This could in turn result in fuses being blown - handy when people are writing final assignments.

    In short, there may be good underlying practical technical reasons for the restrictions. So just arguing this on the legalities while ignoring the practicalities may lead to a pointless legal victory at the cost of fuses blowing when people are writing important assignments.

    If this is the reason to not allow larger TVs, then surely the OP's contract/handbook should limit the number of appliances. Because my two PCs and three monitors plus laptop & iPad definitely draw much more power - but seemingly would fit within these rules just fine.
    Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
    - Mark Twain
    Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon: no matter how good you are at chess, its just going to knock over the pieces and strut around like its victorious.
  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    This handbook states that we may not have a TV in our room that is over 21".
    OP Have you asked for an explanation of why a larger tv is not allowed?
  • Naf
    Naf Posts: 3,183 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    OP Have you asked for an explanation of why a larger tv is not allowed?

    An idea occurs; could this be a really old rule from when a >21" TV would have weighed a ridiculous amount as a CRT. So really the rule ought to be obsolete, but they use it when they want to be awkward?
    Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
    - Mark Twain
    Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon: no matter how good you are at chess, its just going to knock over the pieces and strut around like its victorious.
  • rpc
    rpc Posts: 2,353 Forumite
    By a 30" computer monitor. Then you aren't breaking the rule.

    Then watch TV on it.
  • ValHaller
    ValHaller Posts: 5,212 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Naf wrote: »
    But the hair dryer has a higher load. The poster wasn't comparing energy consumption, but power rating. The hair dryer uses more energy per second & so puts a higher load onto the room's electrics than a TV
    Definitely used the word 'energy' and not power:
    HappyMJ wrote: »
    What about irons and hair dryers...they use a lot more energy?

    I would agree that the hairdryer would be a higher power rating, but when you bring the electrical engineering concept of 'diversity of demand' into it, it may still be reasonable to limit TVs and not bother about hairdryers. If a circuit covers 20 rooms, it would be reasonable to expect to have to cope with 12 TVs, but perhaps with just 1 hairdryer.
    You might as well ask the Wizard of Oz to give you a big number as pay a Credit Referencing Agency for a so-called 'credit-score'
  • You could have a larger tv and if he calls round to inspect the premises just tell him to wait a second and then you can shove it under the bed! :D

    Besides, large tvs are bad for your eyesight. I'm sure the landlord is concerned about your vision. :p
  • Cycrow
    Cycrow Posts: 2,639 Forumite
    maybe it has something to do with the size of the room.

    when i was in halls, some of the rooms there were tiny, with no space to fit large TVs.

    maybe they have desks/tables/stands that might limit the size of the TV that can be put on them.

    afterall, most TV stands limit the size of TV you can use on them
  • And the size may alter the route of escape in a fire

    Look, we're speculating here. Suggest ask the Landlord if a bigger one might be OK
    So many glitches, so little time...
  • ragecake
    ragecake Posts: 189 Forumite
    I don't recall ever having a specific landlord when I was in halls of residence, it was just run by the university itself.

    Most halls rooms are pretty small, and anything over 32inches is generally too big, I had a really rather large room in comparison and it still fit perfectly, It all depends on your definition of large really.

    I consider over 50inches pretty damn big.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.