We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
The MSE Forum Team would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas. However, we know this time of year can be difficult for some. If you're struggling during the festive period, here's a list of organisations that might be able to help
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Has MSE helped you to save or reclaim money this year? Share your 2025 MoneySaving success stories!
Co-op car insurance, possible rejected claim, HELP!!!!
Comments
-
The problem you guys have is that although you are partners there is no insureable interest in that vehicle if you are the policy holder. If you were married then assets are jointly held and as such there is no issue. I agree in this age where people do live together but not married its an archaic scheme but makes sense! Coz really if you write the car off you would receive the indemnity and not your partner so she would be left worse off!
Most call centres are recorded so try and get it listened to! Hopefully long as you guys upheld your end by telling good faith then the broker will end up paying for the repairs and not c.is directly0 -
Get the tapes, check your confirmation documents of the policy change and check your actual policy terms. Somewhere it will mention the use of the car by the policy holder (s) including any additional drivers, which I presume you added before this incident. If you added your partner after this incident then they are right. If you added/changed the policy before the incident then it will be that she is the additional driver. They should treat the claim as if your were driving and there will be an additional access to pay. The RK is irrelevant unless the policy terms state otherwise and this will be very clear.The harder one works the luckier one gets!0
-
dmliverpool wrote: »Get the tapes, check your confirmation documents of the policy change and check your actual policy terms. Somewhere it will mention the use of the car by the policy holder (s) including any additional drivers, which I presume you added before this incident. If you added your partner after this incident then they are right. If you added/changed the policy before the incident then it will be that she is the additional driver. They should treat the claim as if your were driving and there will be an additional access to pay. The RK is irrelevant unless the policy terms state otherwise and this will be very clear.
We have been through all the documents, and there is a discrepancy saying that I am the registered keeper. Our argument though, is that this isn't something that was done on purpose, and it is their job to ask all the relevant questions when setting up the policy. Asking are there any other changes, and asking who is the registered keeper are two completely different questions to me. The advice given by citizens advice is that the insurer should ask for all the information they require, we shouldn't have to think what information we need to volunteer to them. We have been on the same policy since March, I was the registered keeper of our previous vehicle.0 -
The coop do ask online if the car is registered at the dvla in your name.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.7K Spending & Discounts
- 246K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.8K Life & Family
- 259.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards