We are all scammers you know

Custard_Pie

Absolutely hilarious evidence letter sent to a Court by a PPC.

Well done yet again to The Prankster for bringing this into the public domain.

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/ukcps-accuse-defendant-of-internet.html?showComment=1377002147234#c4908174547335132640

Pot, kettle, black

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

its a complete joke, cant imagine judge will be to impressed

The_Slithy_Tove

If I am reading it correctly, UKCPS are urging the court to "strike out" the case, and just award it for the claimant! To have a court simply make a judgement against a defendant, and not allow them to turn up at court and make their case, is surely a gross abuse of the system. And, I presume, a judge would never do this.

By all means, the court can strike out a case, but I don't think UKCPS realise this means they automatically lose.

Orrin

The_Slithy_Tove wrote: »

If I am reading it correctly, UKCPS are urging the court to "strike out" the case, and just award it for the claimant! To have a court simply make a judgement against a defendant, and not allow them to turn up at court and make their case, is surely a gross abuse of the system. And, I presume, a judge would never do this.

It is possible for the court to strike out a defence under CPR 3.4.

Guys_Dad

Orrin wrote: »

It is possible for the court to strike out a defence under CPR 3.4.

Yes when there is no realistic prospect of a win for defendant on the basis of his case http://lexisweb.co.uk/sub-topics/summary-judgment-and-strike-out

esmerobbo

I think I would be embarrassed to attend a court hearing after offering that pile of excrement for a judge to read!

At least if you are going to try that approach let someone competent write the letter.

kirkbyinfurnesslad_2

esmerobbo wrote: »

I think I would be embarrassed to attend a court hearing after offering that pile of excrement for a judge to read!

At least if you are going to try that approach let someone competent write the letter.

Yes am sure the judge would have a few choice words for the claimant

Stroma

That has got to be the most ridiculous and laughable thing I've ever heard from the ukcps scammers. Haswell who must be behind this garbage surely has surpassed himself with this lol

collingbone614

That is so badly written. Hilarious.

Coupon-mad

You would have thought they would have at least tried to cite the Equality Act 2010 (not 'the Equalities Act' which doesn't exist!).

I have seen a UKCPS court statement once before and that same guy, Trevor Goodwood, called us 'forum gurus' then as well! I looked him up on Linked-in and laughed!

The classic line he trotted out in a court paper was that us forum 'gurus' (well...me, probably, in his mind!) actually tell people to say they are disabled just because they wear spectacles or have a broken toenail!

Yes he really did say that for a judge to read!

ripped_off_driver

Ha ha, best laugh I have had in ages. This buffoon is even thicker than Hasbeen.

"Forum gurus" - take a bow all you parking mystics.