We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
offset property income tax against rented flat
Comments
-
OO's comments are absolutely correct re permitted deductions, assuming there is a clear audit trail between the 2, and that the element of resi mge interest being offset, mirrors that invested into the business as a direct result from the equity release exercise(s).
The only issue to be mindful of is in relation to the mortgage application itself and the lenders affordability assessment - which on a residential application is based on the individuals income, as oppossed to a straight BTL application, where affordability (not withstanding any min income requirements), is actually assessed on the rental income itself (@125% of mge interest).
Accordingly, its obv that the amount of equity released to fund any BTL arrangement from a residential dwelling (assuming sufficient free equity and acceptable LTV), will actually be dictated by the applicants income (net of other commitments), which may of course restrict the amount of BTL financing available at resi mge rates.
Hope this helps
Holly x0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards