We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Advice on 2nd house?

Looking for a little advice before I contact a solicitor.
I currently own a home with my wife which we have a small mortgage on.
My mother owns her home (no mortgage) and would like to either add my name on the deeds or change ownership just to my name.
She is in good health and only early 60's.
Would I be liable to capital gains tax or any other tax/problems should I sell the house after she dies?(hopefully not for. Very long time)
If we sell the house so she can move?
She will still live in the house if she doesn't want move.
Thanks

Comments

  • What's her motive for wanting to sign the house over to you and does she realise what a massive risk she might be taking?

    As well as you seeking professional advice I think she should seek some separately, too.
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 13 August 2013 at 10:56PM
    a) yes you would be liable for CGT from the date of transfer into your name to the date you sell it

    b) yes mother's estate would still be liable for IHT since she continues to live in it

    c) yes mother could be held to have intentionally deprived herself of an asset should she want to claim any means tested benefits in the future

    d) yes mother can still live in it even if you own it, assuming you do not need a mortgage to buy her out, ie she gifts it to you and lives there rent free - notwithstanding a) b) or c)! If you charge her rent then that introduces exposure for you to income tax and the concept of notional income if she pays you less than the full open market rental value, for avoidance of doubt - if you don't charge her rent then this is irrelevant. If you need a mortgage to buy her out then her continued occupation could become a problem as lenders do not like renting to family or occupation rent free by ex owners
  • ben2909
    ben2909 Posts: 38 Forumite
    There would be no mortgage as she would be gifting it to me.
    She isn't entitled to ant means tested benefits due to her pensions.
    I wouldn't be charging any rent and she would be responsible for any repairs.
    House is worth around £150000 so IHT won't be a problem.
  • 00ec25
    00ec25 Posts: 9,123 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 14 August 2013 at 1:59PM
    ben2909 wrote: »
    There would be no mortgage as she would be gifting it to me.
    She isn't entitled to ant means tested benefits due to her pensions.
    I wouldn't be charging any rent and she would be responsible for any repairs.
    House is worth around £150000 so IHT won't be a problem.
    then i fail to see the point of the transfer.

    If she did not gift it now, the amount of money you get get in your inheritance would be more since there would be no reduction due to the CGT you will have to pay when you sell if you become owner now rather than selling on inheritance

    if you do not intend to sell on inheritancne then there is no benefit in you being an owner now

    if there is no exposure to IHT then there is no need to transfer it to avoid IHT

    if she can predict that she will not need means tested benefits then there is no need to transfer it to attempt to avoid them

    all the transfer now will achieve is cost money in fees and reduce your inheritance
  • martindow
    martindow Posts: 10,617 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I can't see any advantage for your mother in this idea but lots of downsides. What would happen if you were to die, go bankrupt or get divorced? She could be given notice as a tenant and the house sold as a settlement.

    If the plan is to get the rest of us to pay for her care in the future, hopefully deprivation of assets should scupper that. There seem to be endless downsides but no advantages to anybody in this idea.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.