We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Colleague's home flooded - responsible for neighbour's costs?
Comments
-
DirectDebacle wrote: »A decent neighbour would want to put matters right asap if they had caused damage to a neighbours property, albeit unintentionally.
Would they?
So if an appliance in your house decided to burst into flames and burn down your house *and* your neighbour's, you'd be happy to pay out an unlimited amount to "put matters right", right?
I mean, that's what a decent neighbour would do, right?
Couple of hundred thousand for a rebuilt, maybe 50k of contents...what a decent neighbour you are!
Personally, my washing machine sprung a leak and caused water marks on the ceiling of the flat downstairs - so I gave them the cost of getting it checked out and repainted - because it was the "neighbourly thing" to do - but that was < £100. It would have been a very different story if £7k was involved...
Really, this will just go down as an expensive life lesson for OP's colleague's neighbour. People have insurance for a reason...accidents happen.0 -
Idiophreak wrote: »
Really, this will just go down as an expensive life lesson for OP's colleague's neighbour. People have insurance for a reason...accidents happen.
:T:T:T exactly, and I bet the real expense is nothing like the £7k was it?, that was claimed.
You live and learn as I did, the neighbour needs too.I like the thanks button, but ,please, an I agree button.
Will the grammar and spelling police respect I do make grammatical errors, and have carp spelling, no need to remind me.;)
Always expect the unexpected:eek:and then you won't be dissapointed0 -
There's no legal obligation to have buildings insurance at all - its just mortgage lenders have it as a condition of the mortgage that you must have buildings insurance. Its also pretty foolish not to insure - there's too much at stake!
Sorry for resurrecting this thread but the neighbour should check their contract when buying their house. I have buildings insurance even though I don't have a mortgage as in my contract terms that I signed off when buying my house I agreed to have buildings insurance. I don't know legally where I'd stand if I didn't and something happened and it may just apply to terraced houses like mine but the neighbour may not be breaking the law but may be breaking the terms of their contract and maybe there are repercussions there? Am I reaching??i before e, except when you run a feisty heist on a weird beige foreign neighbour0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards