We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

scanning old printed photos to add to FB

katejo
katejo Posts: 4,506 Forumite
Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
I want to scan some old printed photos from the 80's to send to others/put on a web page or FB. I have done a test one but it remains small in the corner of the frame. Is there a free software program available to improve this or would I have to buy expensive photo editing software? Not sure whether I can do it at all.
«1

Comments

  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    What resolution did you scan it at?
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • 2010
    2010 Posts: 5,579 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    katejo wrote: »
    Is there a free software program available to improve this

    http://imageresizer.codeplex.com/
  • googler
    googler Posts: 16,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Most scanning software allows you to select the area to scan, so that you don't scan the whole A4 scanner bed, when you only have a 6x4 print in the corner.

    Look at your scanner options, it sounds like you're scanning A4, when you want to home in on the print
  • johnmc
    johnmc Posts: 1,265 Forumite
    edited 11 August 2013 at 6:31PM
    As others have said; on the scanner options you should have a preview option, which is a low resolution scan.

    Move the scan area to the previewed size.

    If they are just meant to be viewed online then anything more than 80 dpi will be wasted, as pictures will be displayed at 70 dpi and the size increased to account for it.

    I always scan at the highest I can, store in a single folder and then use Irfan View http://www.irfanview.com to batch reduce for the web.
  • katejo
    katejo Posts: 4,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    OK have tried selecting the size and accepted the default resolution of 200. I still haven't got it right as I am not sure where on the scanner to lay the photo. I have tried several places but part of the photo always gets chopped off. It doesn't help that the size doesn't actually match the 6 x 4 or 5 x 7 exactly.
  • katejo
    katejo Posts: 4,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    johnmc wrote: »
    As others have said; on the scanner options you should have a preview option, which is a low resolution scan.

    Move the scan area to the previewed size.

    If they are just meant to be viewed online then anything more than 80 dpi will be wasted, as pictures will be displayed at 70 dpi and the size increased to account for it.

    I always scan at the highest I can, store in a single folder and then use Irfan View http://www.irfanview.com to batch reduce for the web.

    i didn't see your reply before I typed the one below.
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    200dpi is far too high for web use, you just need 72dpi.
    It doesn't matter where you place the original on the platen, what you need to do is crop the scan area before you scan. You can only scan in pro to the original though.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
  • johnmc
    johnmc Posts: 1,265 Forumite
    macman wrote:
    200dpi is far too high for web use, you just need 72dpi.
    Agreed. I have a standalone (read="old") scanner and from my experience I lose quality of the picture if I scan at anything less than 1,000. In particular it loses shadow detail and affects the contrast.

    By scanning at a higher rate it gives a much better copy without spending ages messing around with colour balance, Brightness and Contrast etc after scanning.

    I place the scanned photos into a single folder and then run Irfan View in batch mode which automatically converts the pictures to web size.

    Yes, I could buy a modern scanner which may well do a better job, but this one works fine, thanks. :-)
  • I had to send a number of documents to a client, before the start of a contract, just at the same time I had a new lap top and I couldn't get the printer/scanner to work. Luckily I had a second printer, but used my phone to take .jpg's Because of the size, I then copied them into a word document, and saved (or printed) them as a PDF, so that I could email them easier.
    Client, was happy.
    Scanner is now working, but nobody with a decent camera really needs one.
  • macman
    macman Posts: 53,129 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You can't scan for anything other than web display using a camera that takes only JPEG's.
    Decent graphics quality does not use JPEG's, it requires usually TIFF or RAW files, which are not lossy.
    No free lunch, and no free laptop ;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.