We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Parking eye fine for entering a carpark for 14 minutes
Options
Comments
-
Hiya,
Thanks for the tips, I did copy a previous appeal and made a lot of changes so it was relevant to the specific charge...but I accidentally copied the unedited version to here. Thank you all for your assistance, I will let you know of the outcome. How long does it usually take to get a response?
POPLA is seriously behind schedule because of the volume of appeals generated (probably as the result of forums such as this, Pepipoo, and CAG encouraging this as the default method of dealing with PCNs).
I think you should budget on around two months after submission - so November (unless POPLA take on even more assessors).Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
POPLA is seriously behind schedule because of the volume of appeals generated (probably as the result of forums such as this, Pepipoo, and CAG encouraging this as the default method of dealing with PCNs).0
-
Hi you awesome people! I just received the verdict from POPLA and our appeal was successful. Thank you so much for all your help. Here is what they had to say
The Operator issued parking charge notice number 020938/694131 arising out of the presence at Holy Trinity Church in Newquay, on 26 July 2013, of a vehicle with registration mark *******
The Appellant appealed against liability for the parking charge.
The Assessor has considered the evidence of both parties and has determined that the appeal be allowed.
The Assessor’s reasons are as set out.
The Operator should now cancel the parking charge notice forthwith.
Parking on Private Land Appeals is administered by the Transport and Environment Committee of London Councils
Calls to Parking on Private Land Appeals may be recorded
Reasons for the Assessor’s Determination
At 08:34 on the 26 July 2013, a vehicle with registration mark ******* was recorded by Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) camera entering the car park at Holy Trinity Church in Newquay. After 14 minutes, at 08:49, the same vehicle was recorded by the ANPR camera exiting the car park.
It is the Operator’s case that the site is a paid parking car park as clearly stated on the signage on site. As the Appellant had failed to purchase valid parking in line with the terms and conditions, a parking charge was correctly issued.
The Appellant has raised several issues in his appeal; however I will only deal with the point on which I am allowing this appeal. The Appellant has stated that there is no genuine pre-estimate of loss, i.e. that there could have been no loss to the landowner arising from the visit of less than 15 minutes.
The Operator submits that the charge is a genuine pre-estimate of loss, but that in any event the charge is commercially justified.
The wording of the signage on site seems to indicate that the charge represents damages for a breach of the parking contract. Accordingly, the charge must be a genuine pre-estimate of loss.
The Operator is required to show that the losses stated are directly related to the Appellant’s failure to purchase valid parking. In this case, the Operator has stated that the charge is a genuine pre-estimate of loss as they incur ‘significant costs in managing this car park to ensure that motorists comply with the stated terms and conditions.’ The Operator has stated that the costs include the erection and maintenance of site signage, installation, monitoring
and maintenance of the Automatic Number Plate Recognition systems, employment of office based administrative staff, membership fees, and general costs including stationary and postage. In this case, the justification appears to be on the basis of general operating costs rather than addressing the loss actually caused as a result of not purchasing valid parking.
Although the Operator has stated that the charge is commercially justified, the amount sought for the breach of the terms and conditions cannot be the entire source of their income and must be loss based rather than based on profit in order to amount to a genuine pre-estimate of loss. I do not accept the Operator’s submission that the inclusion of costs which in reality amount to
the general business costs incurred for the provision of their car park management services is commercially justified. The whole business model of 6062333018 2 04 December 2013 an Operator in respect of a particular car park operation cannot of itself amount to commercial justification.
Consequently I must find that the Operator has failed to produce sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the parking charge is a genuine pre-estimate of loss.
Accordingly, I must allow the appeal.0 -
well done indeed, another one in the eye for the cowboys
they just never seem to "get it" , but they will ; with their fake and unenforceable PCN,`s0 -
Seeing a lot of these now. It's no wonder POPLA are (allegedly) catching up on their backlog. Now, as soon as they see the magic words Not a Genuine Pre-Estimate of Loss, all they need to do is confirm the PPC is alleging breach of contract, copy'n'paste their standard paragraphs (as seen above and also in many other appeals) into the appeal result and job done.0
-
Hi pretty much the same thing happened to me. So I'm writing my appeal to PE. I put "the driver" with any reference to myself right?0
-
Hi pretty much the same thing happened to me. So I'm writing my appeal to PE. I put "the driver" with any reference to myself right?
everything you need to know is contained in the NEWBIES sticky thread at the top of this forum, second one down
if you need any more help, please start a new thread , thanks0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards