We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Broken TV

steverg
steverg Posts: 1 Newbie
edited 6 August 2013 at 11:22AM in Consumer rights
My TV broke

Comments

  • InsideInsurance
    InsideInsurance Posts: 22,460 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Poor TV isnt a criminal and it hasnt broken any laws :)

    After 6 months it is up to you to prove (1) that it is an inherent fault and not due to missuse etc and (2) that you have not received a reasonable life from it.

    Have you had an engineer do a report on it to determine the cause of failure? How much did you pay for the TV? How old was the TV at the point of purchase?

    Assuming you havent then personally in the first instance I'd write to Curry's head office with a complaint.
  • InsideInsurance
    InsideInsurance Posts: 22,460 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    steverg wrote: »
    Currys engineer has said that it would cost £100+ to repair it and it's an inherent fault.

    Did they give you this in writing? If not then what the actual report says is more important as what they say to your face and what they write can be very different things.

    Under the sales of goods act it is up to the retailer on how to deal with the matter, replace, repair, refund. If they chose refund then they are entitled to deduct what use you've had from the item from the monies given.

    As per the previous post I would write to HO and clearly saying their engineer stated its an inherent fault (and enclosing the report if you have it).

    On a 150 TV thats 18 months old, a 75 credit is probably an acceptable result in my opinion.
  • InsideInsurance
    InsideInsurance Posts: 22,460 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ultimately your choice

    For a small track court case you'd be best off getting an engineers report to confirm its inherent fault as the existing one doesnt say one way or the other. You could end up paying for that, issuing fees etc and lose. You may pay that and get it and the circa 100 quid back. Depends on how important that amount of money is in your life -v- the hassle of having to get it.
  • neilmcl
    neilmcl Posts: 19,460 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    steverg wrote: »
    Thanks for your help, he told me it's an inherent fault, but on the report it just says that new parts are needed for £100+ but still I'll pass it on to them.
    If they refuse, is it worth taking legal action etc?
    Thanks very much.
    Bear in mind that they could simply (and legally) offer you a partial refund and for a refurbished TV, that you spent £150 on 18 mths earlier, this could be quite low.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.