We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Insulation
bouicca21
Posts: 6,798 Forumite
Just seen a house that I quite like. It was built in 1934, does not have cavity walls. The exterior walls have been painted/sprayed with something by a company called Rockex HP. The roof has spray insulation on the undersides of the tiles.
I've seen enough on the web to know that the spray insulation in the roof might cause problems. Have no idea about the exterior wall stuff, except that it sounds like a waste of money.
Do either of these sound serious enough to think twice about making an offer? I quite like the house. Not ecstatic about it, but it does tick several boxes. There is work that needs doing but nothing drastic.
I've seen enough on the web to know that the spray insulation in the roof might cause problems. Have no idea about the exterior wall stuff, except that it sounds like a waste of money.
Do either of these sound serious enough to think twice about making an offer? I quite like the house. Not ecstatic about it, but it does tick several boxes. There is work that needs doing but nothing drastic.
0
Comments
-
I would be wary of this.
For peace of mind it depends what guarantee is issued with the work and is it insurance backed? Is the work approved by Building Control at the local council? Is the work covered by a BBA Certificate or anything similar? Who has overseen the work and signed it off for quality control purposes?
The list goes on for both the wall insulation and the roof spraying
Ultimately it is your decision, but this is an area awash with fraudsters, cowboys and snake oil salesmen.0 -
I basically agree with the above - but in the interests of balance, try to distinguish with whether these two treatments
* actually do harm/cause damage or
* just make little improvement (so are just a rather pointless waste of money0 -
Thanks - what I am concerned about is whether the treatments cause harm, either now or in the future. If the owner wasted his money that's his problem, not mine!
I am trying to decide between two very different properties, and it isn't easy.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.9K Spending & Discounts
- 248K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.9K Life & Family
- 262.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards