We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Completion halted due to IVA charge on house

Hi

I'm writing on behalf of my sister.

She was about to complete on a house as a FTB. All seemed fine.

The vendors are separated. Doesn't sound amicable. The wife was the one arranging the sale.

So things are running smoothly (we thought). Vendors moved out, no chain etc.

The money went into the solicitor's account but then bang. Solicitor says there is an IVA charge on property. It's related to the husband and apparently wife didn't know.

The house cost them 118k in 2006. My sister was going to purchase for 98k.

That's all I know. I think this sale won't be able to proceed (hope I'm wrong). She's going to lose her fees.

Is there anything she can do?
"fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." (Bertrand Russell)

Comments

  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Her solicitor should have ensured before exchange that unencumbered title would be available on completion and that clearly is not the case. It sounds like there may be mortgage negative equity as well as the second charge, looking at the £118k/£98k situation.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • Dan-Dan
    Dan-Dan Posts: 5,279 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    isnt this sort of info ironed out etc long before this stage?!
    Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.
  • kingstreet
    kingstreet Posts: 39,335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Usually, the vendor's solicitor will ensure the vendor has spoken to any chargeholders and established they will be happy to lift the charges on completion day to allow the sale to go through.

    If the vendor has not done so, this is going nowhere, with the purchaser unable to complete and out of pocket and unlikely to sue the vendor for breach of contract as they probably have nothing.
    I am a mortgage broker. You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice. Please do not send PMs asking for one-to-one-advice, or representation.
  • flashnazia
    flashnazia Posts: 2,168 Forumite
    kingstreet wrote: »
    Her solicitor should have ensured before exchange that unencumbered title would be available on completion and that clearly is not the case. It sounds like there may be mortgage negative equity as well as the second charge, looking at the £118k/£98k situation.

    That's what I was thinking unless the charge was slapped on the house at last minute? If not I think a reduction in legal fees are in order.
    Will hopefully know more later.
    "fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." (Bertrand Russell)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.