We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Charge Notice / Not Showing Original Fee Due
Options
fourcheeze
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi all,
I recently got one of these NtKs although Moto Customer Services have cancelled it after I laid out the legal reasons why it didn't have a leg to stand on. (Thanks to all here for the relevant info.)
However one thing I noticed was that the PoF says:
(2)The notice must—
(a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;
(b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full;
(c)describe the parking charges due from the driver as at the end of that period, the circumstances in which the requirement to pay them arose (including the means by which the requirement was brought to the attention of drivers) and the other facts that made them payable;"
In my case the CN only mentions the £90 reduced to £50 that I'm now due, not the amount (I think it might be £10 or £12) that would have been due at the end of the parking period.
I haven't seen this mentioned before. I wonder if anyone has successfully used this in an appeal to POPLA.
I recently got one of these NtKs although Moto Customer Services have cancelled it after I laid out the legal reasons why it didn't have a leg to stand on. (Thanks to all here for the relevant info.)
However one thing I noticed was that the PoF says:
(2)The notice must—
(a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;
(b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full;
(c)describe the parking charges due from the driver as at the end of that period, the circumstances in which the requirement to pay them arose (including the means by which the requirement was brought to the attention of drivers) and the other facts that made them payable;"
In my case the CN only mentions the £90 reduced to £50 that I'm now due, not the amount (I think it might be £10 or £12) that would have been due at the end of the parking period.
I haven't seen this mentioned before. I wonder if anyone has successfully used this in an appeal to POPLA.
0
Comments
-
Yep, thanks for posting it though. This is used sometimes where a NTK is not compliant, see here:
http://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/keeper-liability/
Well done for getting it cancelled.PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards