PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Landlord has altered inventory

In the course of negotiating for the release of my deposit (held in scheme but term and start dates are incorrect), I asked the landlord for a copy of the inventory. The inventory he provided (in pdf format) has been altered to remove my comment on the condition of a fitting. The history of the alteration is on the pdf properties, and I have a dated digital photograph of the original with the removed comment clearly shown. I haven't yet entered a dispute on the deposit scheme but wonder if they would take notice of such an occurrence?

Thank you.
«1

Comments

  • DRP
    DRP Posts: 4,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    EM1 wrote: »
    In the course of negotiating for the release of my deposit (held in scheme but term and start dates are incorrect), I asked the landlord for a copy of the inventory. The inventory he provided (in pdf format) has been altered to remove my comment on the condition of a fitting. The history of the alteration is on the pdf properties, and I have a dated digital photograph of the original with the removed comment clearly shown. I haven't yet entered a dispute on the deposit scheme but wonder if they would take notice of such an occurrence?

    Thank you.

    sounds like he's a bit of an IT dunce :rotfl:

    is the 'fitting' part of the dispute?
  • EM1
    EM1 Posts: 9 Forumite
    Thanks for the quick reply. Yes it is.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Did you sign theoriginal inventory?

    If so,presumably you signature is missing from thisaltered version?

    Do you have a copy of the original one with your signature?

    Write to the LL rejecting the inventory and make clear you will be relying on the original.
  • paddyrg
    paddyrg Posts: 13,543 Forumite
    Don't show your cards yet re the revision history - if he won't behave after saying you want the original signed inventory then you'll have fun in court when he gets a proper slap.
  • EM1
    EM1 Posts: 9 Forumite
    G_M wrote: »
    Did you sign theoriginal inventory?

    If so,presumably you signature is missing from thisaltered version?

    Do you have a copy of the original one with your signature?

    Write to the LL rejecting the inventory and make clear you will be relying on the original.

    My signature is on his recently sent altered copy (pdf) but not on my photograph of the inventory. I took the photographs of the inventory just before I signed it in the kitchen of the property. I was promised a signed copy but did not receive one. Stupid, I know.

    Thank you for the reply.
  • EM1
    EM1 Posts: 9 Forumite
    paddyrg wrote: »
    Don't show your cards yet re the revision history - if he won't behave after saying you want the original signed inventory then you'll have fun in court when he gets a proper slap.

    Ok. I should now ask him for the original signed inventory then?

    Thank you.
  • Angelicdevil
    Angelicdevil Posts: 1,707 Forumite
    edited 26 July 2013 at 2:45PM
    Or just let him go via the courts and then reveal your little gem about his revision of the original inventory.

    He obviously thinks he's pretty smart but the court won't.
    I have a simple philosophy:
    Fill what's empty. Empty what's full. Scratch where it itches.
    - Alice Roosevelt Longworth
  • Herbalus
    Herbalus Posts: 2,634 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Or just let him go via the courts and then reveal your little gem about his revision of the original inventory.

    He obviously thinks he's pretty smart but the court won't.

    Regardless of the fact that tampering with the evidence is going to make a judge rip him to shreds, defending yourself in court isn't a task that anyone should be eager to do. It doesn't matter if you have the law 100% behind you - it still takes time and effort.

    Ask for the original copy, in writing, and see what the response is.
  • EM1
    EM1 Posts: 9 Forumite
    Herbalus wrote: »
    Regardless of the fact that tampering with the evidence is going to make a judge rip him to shreds, defending yourself in court isn't a task that anyone should be eager to do. It doesn't matter if you have the law 100% behind you - it still takes time and effort.

    Ask for the original copy, in writing, and see what the response is.

    Thank you. I shall do this.
  • steve-L
    steve-L Posts: 12,981 Forumite
    Herbalus wrote: »
    Regardless of the fact that tampering with the evidence is going to make a judge rip him to shreds, defending yourself in court isn't a task that anyone should be eager to do. It doesn't matter if you have the law 100% behind you - it still takes time and effort.

    Ask for the original copy, in writing, and see what the response is.

    Absolutely agree....

    HOWEVER: I once had the same thing with a bank though on paper, I had a copy of the original document for a transfer (in NOK) to a NOK account in the UK. My Norwegian bank then altered the signed document to change the NOK to GBP. (This was for about £30k) so they could charge me a exchange rate and charge (several hundred pounds)

    I played dumb and requested the copy they sent me with my sig and the altered document then I wrote back showing mine and demanded compensation for losses as they had obviously edited my signed document and I had proof.

    I defined my compensation for losses at around £10,000 or we could go to court. My losses would then include travel to from Norway, loss of earnings ........

    They paid the next day
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.